Hi Mark On 21/11/12 12:49, Mark Stosberg wrote: > >> I am planning to change CGI::Snapp's base class from Hash::FieldHash to >> Moos (sic). > > I would definitely support using one of the Moose-compatible projects. I > am thinking of moving PSGI::Application from Any::Moose to Moo.
I just had another look at Moo. I'm undecided so far. > I looked at 'Moos' a bit as well. I factored in that Moo has quickly > traction and has a number of extensions and users already, while Mouse > appears to have lost steam, and Moos appears to have a rather small user > base at this point as well. I'll have to investigate the extensions before deciding. Since Moo is comparatively small, it's definitely a possibility. >> Unifying them has other benefits, since I have some modules which will >> dove-tail nicely by switching to Moos as well: >> >> o Local::Config. This loads a config file per project. It wraps >> File::HomeDir to load a file using the project's name. >> >> o Local::Logger, which uses the project-specific dbh from >> Local::Connector, since my projects all log to a db. >> >> o Local::Connector. This uses Local::Config's per project file to wrap >> DBIx::Connector to create a project-specific dbh. > > I'll be interested to see these. In parallel, I've been developing Moose > roles for PSGI::App for config file loading, logging and databas access. I'll look at any private data they might contain, and upload them to my web site. A few minutes ago I added Local::Session, to wrap Data::Session. Naturally it uses Local::Connector. > What I have now is for Moose and a bit project-specific, but I plan to > make CPAN-ready Moo-based variants at some point. Would you support Moo /and/ Moose variants long term? I wouldn't bother myself. Or are you saying the public versions would use Moo? > I wrote more about the config role here, and posted a link to some > similar code: > > http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2012/11/the-curious-case-of-the-justifiable-but-slow-singleton.html#comment-1768 Hmm. Perhaps I should write an article too. > My Database role integrates with DBIx::Simple currently. Eventually, I > would like to switch transactions to use DBIx::Connector as well. Understood. -- Ron Savage http://savage.net.au/ Ph: 0421 920 622 ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
