On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 05:08:32PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > Am Montag, den 06.12.2010, 08:46 -0700 schrieb Alan Post: > > I selected equal? in this case because the *lists* aren't going to > > be pointer-equal, just their contents, and the contents fall into > > two distinct classes, procedures and strings, and the strings won't > > be eq? for the same reason the lists aren't. > > > Just an idea (which is probably a bad one, if your strings come from > dynamic input as opposed to local, static data like grammars or alike): > Feed the strings through string->symbol. >
Actually, that's quite a good idea. I'm not attached to the stringyness of the data, I believe later the string becomes a keyword, so I can move that calculation up before this code. Wonderful, thank you. -Alan -- .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
