On 06.04.2011, at 18:23, randal k <cisco...@data102.com> Situation is that I have > a 6509, and I need to make a single blade on the chassis have a completely > separate VLAN database from the rest of the chassis, effectively letting me > use a VLAN twice on the chassis without allowing them to talk to each other.
Why? Just buy a 2960 with 48 ports or use a platforn which creates virtual switches. Could you not just use for eg Vlan100 on module 1 and vlan200 on mod 2. you could then connect the second switch via access ports rather than trunks and translate the vlan in this way. - Very confusing however > > I dig that this can be done with protected ports or PVLANs, but am hoping > for a more "assign all the ports to a new VRF"-style solution. A good solution if you need job security - dont think I would want to maintain this. Regards Andrew > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
