Tom Tromey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> libgcj is very portable (though perhaps not widely ported).  It can
> run on systems without a filesystem, for instance.  I can't speak for
> Classpath, but I can say that libgcj's goal is and will continue to be
> portability to a wide variety of systems (including Windows, should
> someone do the port).

Portability is one of our goals, hence we write as much in Java as
possible.

-- 
Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/

Reply via email to