Tom Tromey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > libgcj is very portable (though perhaps not widely ported). It can > run on systems without a filesystem, for instance. I can't speak for > Classpath, but I can say that libgcj's goal is and will continue to be > portability to a wide variety of systems (including Windows, should > someone do the port). Portability is one of our goals, hence we write as much in Java as possible. -- Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Stuart Ballard
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Mark Benvenuto
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Jochen Hoenicke
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Stuart Ballard
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Artur Biesiadowski
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Tom Tromey
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Tom Tromey
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Brian Jones
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Jochen Hoenicke