I'm not positive, but I think you may be misunderstanding the effect of :>> in condp. When it's used the true condition input is used to invoke a function rather than evaluate an expression. This makes sense in condp because the cases are values.
In cond, the cases are logical expressions and often are just "true" when evaluated, so not particularly useful for the matched expression. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
