Indeed, I misunderstood it. Thanks!
Le vendredi 9 juin 2017 19:57:11 UTC+2, Alex Miller a écrit : > > I'm not positive, but I think you may be misunderstanding the effect of > :>> in condp. When it's used the true condition input is used to invoke a > function rather than evaluate an expression. This makes sense in condp > because the cases are values. > > In cond, the cases are logical expressions and often are just "true" when > evaluated, so not particularly useful for the matched expression. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
