Good job tracking down that diff -- upon looking at it, unfortunately, I obviously don't understand the underlying issue being fixed (the inter-binding dependencies) because the "old code" basically matches what I would think would be the way to avoid introducing this in an outer let form -- clearly the old code must have significant or subtle issues of its own!
On Nov 2, 10:39 am, Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> wrote: > Thus this commit allows to write (loop [[x & xs] s y xs] ...) but > introduces this head-retention behaviour. > > Right now I can't see how loop can be made to support both cases. > Hopefully someone else will. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
