On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 13:49, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com>wrote:
> There's no solution here that will be perfect for all cases. But I've made > the decision that c.c.json will always "downgrade" Clojure types to the > nearest equivalent JSON types. It does not promise round-trip preservation > of types not specified by JSON, such as sets. In this case, that means > Ratios should become doubles. I've pushed this change to master. > I'd spent some time considering supplying a patch similar to this - two things stopped me and instead had me write the multi-methods supplied later: (a) my CA is sat at home un-mailed. (b) I kinda like I can send ratio's to and from clojure end points Is it a terrible idea to provide an optional flag to the parser that says whether this coercion should take place or not - defaulting to the interop version, but still preserving the accuracy of numbers if the recipient is clojure? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
