especially haskell & scala are missing in your list :)
as long as you haven't at least seen haskell, you haven't seen the creme de
la creme of statically typed languages


2013/10/9 Softaddicts <lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca>

> Let's see:
>
> strong data typing:
>
> Fortran
> Cobol
> Pl/1
> Pascal
> C/C++
> Java
> C#
> Ruby
>
> à la carte data typing or no data typing at all:
>
> Basic (more or less depending on the implementation)
> Lisp
> Clojure
> A dozen assemblers
> A dozen scripting languages
>
> And I probably forgot some while excluding the ones I worked with
> (Algol, Simula, GPSS, ...) in academic projects. I used the above ones
> on real projects at work and not small projects.
>
> Lets keep SQL out of the picture, it's an exaggeration to call this a
> programming
> language.
>
> Still prefer less data typing or no typing at all :)
>
> Luc P.
>
>
> > let's see...
> > really used:
> > sql
> > java
> > javascript
> > basic
> > pascal/delphi
> > scala
> >
> > experimented with:
> > logo (some old language intended to teach people to make their first
> steps)
> > haskell
> > kotlin
> > clojure
> >
> > seen in action:
> > php
> > groovy
> >
> > still prefer smart static typing :D
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/9 Nando Breiter <na...@aria-media.com>
> >
> > >
> > >> The best explanation of these misunderstandings I've come across is
> "What
> > >> to Know Before Debating Type Systems":
> > >>
> > >> http://cdsmith.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/an-old-article-i-wrote/
> > >>
> > >>
> > > I have learned quite a lot from reading this article and following this
> > > discussion, particularly that "type" and "type checking" is much more
> > > nuanced and complex than I have understood until now, and that the
> terms
> > > "static" and "dynamic" expand into a much larger range of issues upon
> close
> > > examination, such as the difference between explicitly declaring types
> (as
> > > in Java) and implicitly inferring types from code context. Quoting
> from the
> > > article:
> > >
> > > *Many programmers approach the question of whether they prefer static
> or
> > > dynamic types by comparing some languages they know that use both
> > > techniques. This is a reasonable approach to most questions of
> preference.
> > > The problem, in this case, is that most programmers have limited
> > > experience, and haven’t tried a lot of languages. For context, here,
> six or
> > > seven doesn't count as “a lot.”*
> > > *
> > > *
> > >
> > > So I can say I prefer dynamic typing, but the reasons are more
> personal,
> > > and molded by my development experience.
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> > > your first post.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> > > ---
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "Clojure" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an
> > > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >
> --
> Softaddicts<lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca> sent by ibisMail from my ipad!
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to