If you only created the atom once, the value of the atom would be the same no matter where you dereferenced it. If you're seeing two different atoms, then the code that created the atom must have been executed more than once.
Without seeing your code it's impossible to know for sure how that occurred. There's nothing obvious in the pseudocode you presented that would indicate where the atom is being created more than once. - James On 9 May 2014 22:49, Timothy Washington <twash...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, just reading this now. > > I've pivoted on that project, and that code is no longer around. We were > going to store analytics data in that atom, but instead are going to do JVM > and other kinds of profiling. > > But if you look at my first message, component *:a* would have had the > atom. The *:updater* and *:reader* components were referencing that. Now, > if there's any duplication like what you describe, it would have to come > where I set up the component system/map. But my code's perspective, I only > created that atom once. Sorry I don't have immediate access to that code. I > can't show it to you either. But if need be, I can go back in git history, > and troubleshoot the codebase as it was on April 30th. But again, my > description abouve fairly captures the situation. > > > Lemme know > > Tim Washington > Interruptsoftware.com <http://interruptsoftware.com> > > > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Actually, now that I think about it, that's not right. It shouldn't >> matter where or when you create the Atom. >> >> Instead, what I suspect you have is two or more instances of the >> component containing the Atom, thus two different Atoms. >> >> You can tell if the Atoms are the same object by printing them, which >> shows a unique hash of each Atom's identity. >> >> -S >> >> >> >> On Monday, May 5, 2014 6:25:55 PM UTC-4, frye wrote: >> >>> Ahh, so that was it then. Yeah, I definitely created that atom in the >>> start method. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Stuart Sierra < >>> the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> At what point did you **create** the Atom in :a? Any mutable >>>> references which need to be shared among all usages of a component must be >>>> created in the **constructor**, not the `start` or `stop` methods. >>>> >>> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
