Ok I will keep changes ready, and will merge once 4.0's news is declared. -Vijay V.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 9:16 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Integrating autoscale branch to master? > > > > On 10/12/2012 05:38 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: > >> I think we agreed that autoscale could be merged in after 4.0? > > > > True. > > > > I am assuming getting it now into master should not cause trouble for "4.0". > > > > Although I think you are right we might still be cherry-picking some commits. > Could you wait until 4.0 is really out of the door? I'm assuming this will be > done somewhere mid next week. > > I just want to prevent some merging hell between master and 4.0 should it > be required for some unforeseen reason. > > Wido > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > >> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 9:00 PM > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Integrating autoscale branch to master? > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 10/12/2012 05:09 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I have rebased autoscale branch against master and testing on a > >>> private > >> setup. > >>> If all unit test cases work fine, the plan is to rebase once again > >>> on Monday (15th October India Time) and get autoscale to master. > >>> > >>> Any concerns/comments? > >>> > >> > >> I can't talk about the stability of the code, but I think we agreed > >> that autoscale could be merged in after 4.0? > >> > >> I'm not against it being merged in. > >> > >> Wido > >> > >>> I have asked Pranav for help and he has agreed to commit. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Vijay V. > >>>
