Dual stack in user VM or router VM? router VM must have dual stack because link-local is still ipv4, right?
Anthony > -----Original Message----- > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 11:13 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > > The spec calls for dualstack, so ipv4 would still work? > > I think it would be stage 2 of phase 1, after ipv6 stack only. > > --Sheng > > > > On 1/17/13 3:49 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > > > >>On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com> > wrote: > >>>> We just want to make thing as simple as possible for the phase 1. > The > >>>> service other than DNS/DHCP would be supported later, and depends > on > >>>> how much time we have. > >>>> > >>> > >>> How do you present something like this to the end user if it works > one > >>>way and not another. It needs to be consistent. > >>> > >>Let's get the DNS/DHCP part done first... > >> > >>--Sheng > >
