On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Anthony Xu <xuefei...@citrix.com> wrote: > Dual stack in user VM or router VM? > router VM must have dual stack because link-local is still ipv4, right?
Dual-stack is one interface has both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. If there is dual-stack, it must be at both user VM and router VM, at public interface. Link-local interface of router is still there even it's IPv6 only on public interface. --Sheng > > > Anthony > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 11:13 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) >> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal >> <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > The spec calls for dualstack, so ipv4 would still work? >> >> I think it would be stage 2 of phase 1, after ipv6 stack only. >> >> --Sheng >> > >> > On 1/17/13 3:49 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >> > >> >>On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com> >> wrote: >> >>>> We just want to make thing as simple as possible for the phase 1. >> The >> >>>> service other than DNS/DHCP would be supported later, and depends >> on >> >>>> how much time we have. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> How do you present something like this to the end user if it works >> one >> >>>way and not another. It needs to be consistent. >> >>> >> >>Let's get the DNS/DHCP part done first... >> >> >> >>--Sheng >> >
