ABSOLUTELY! --Alex
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 10:33 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [QA][DISCUSS] Should we document formal release criteria? > > Hi all, > > Some IRC discussion triggered this thought: > > Should we document our formal release criteria? By that, I mean - should we > document the criteria that we use to claim that we are in a position to cut an > actual Release Candidate for voting? > > I realized that I've had my own view sitting in my head, but obviously that > means that nobody else knows it! > > Thoughts about what our criteria should be? > > Here's what's in my head: > > No Blocker Bugs outstanding > No Critical Bugs outstanding (unless there is a work-around, and only < > 5 like that) > Builds all work > Packaging all works for the selected OS's Docs and Translation updates > checked in > > > Thoughts? > > -chip
