Hi Radhika,

IPV6 section looks good. I had a couple of comments:

1.In 4.1.2.2. Limitations of IPv6 in CloudStack
"4. The administrator cannot specify the IPv6 address of a VM"

        This is not a limitation. This needs to be removed.

2. In 4.1.5. Changed API Commands in 4.1-incubating 

listNetworks command ->  2 parameters have been added - "ip6gateway","ip6cidr"

-Thanks
Sangeetha

-----Original Message-----
From: Radhika Puthiyetath 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 6:58 AM
To: Chip Childers
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sangeetha Hariharan; Sheng Yang
Subject: RE: [ACS41][DOCS]updating pots and po files

Sure. I am going to commit whatever I have done, so far.

Sangeetha/ Sheng: any more review comments ?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 7:26 PM
To: Radhika Puthiyetath
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sangeetha Hariharan; Sheng Yang
Subject: Re: [ACS41][DOCS]updating pots and po files

Radhika,

The 22nd was the date that we were going to cut our first RC...  So I think 
we're going to go with what we have.

IPv6 is going to be "experimental" in this release, so can we get whatever 
portion is done committed?

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath 
<radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> I thought 22nd is the date for doc freeze.
>
> The IPv6 doc is under review. I need a day to commit them as I am still 
> expecting comments from Sangeetha/ Sheng.
>
> Thanks
> -Radhika
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 6:37 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Developers
> Cc: Chip Childers
> Subject: [ACS41][DOCS]updating pots and po files
>
> Chip,
>
> I am ready to update the /docs/pot directory and download the po files for 
> the translations.
>
> Warning: Something to note about the po files (which contains the translated 
> strings). There will be one file per corresponding xml files.
> So if we commit them to the repo (and I think we should), this is going to be 
> lots of small files.
>
> First question: Do we agree to commit the translation in the repo ?
>
> Second question: Do you want to do it, or can I do it in the 4.1 branch 
> directly ?
>
> -Sebastien
>

Reply via email to