Thanks for pointing that mistake, I fixed it. About g++: g++ is gcc with -lstdc++
What is wrong with a simple CMake file? I know what is good about it, if CMake had it built in neither me nor any CMake user would need to write neither a simple header file nor a simple CMake file. Kind regards, Hilton On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:37:47 +0100 Hendrik Sattler <p...@hendrik-sattler.de> wrote: > Am Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010 19:46:57 schrieb Hilton Medeiros: > > macro (check_gcc_visibility) > > include (CheckCXXCompilerFlag) > > check_cxx_compiler_flag(-fvisibility=hidden > > GCC_SUPPORTS_VISIBILITY) endmacro() > > This macro does not check if gcc supports visibility but g++ instead. > > > function (add_visibility_definitions) > > set (GCC_EXPORT __attribute__\(\(visibility\(\"default\"\)\)\)) > > set (GCC_PRIVATE __attribute__\(\(visibility\(\"hidden\"\)\)\)) > > set (WIN_EXPORT __declspec\(dllexport\)) > > set (WIN_PRIVATE __declspec\(dllimport\)) > > Those are not correct: there is no equivalent of GCC_PRIVATE for MSVC. > What's wrong with a simple header file? > > HS _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
