How does this differ from writing to XMLOutput. It seems XMLOutput is being confused with the context...?
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:54:11 +0200, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe one little quick example: > > - currently, jelly-swing's ComponentTag calls, somewhere down in its > doTag() findAncestorWithClass(ContainerTag.class) to which they call > addComponent... At least one major drawback: putting such in a defined > tag does not work unless you go till the top-level container in the > defined tag (so no re-used swing script-snippets). Many other issues... > - proposed: jelly-swing's ComponentTag should call, in its doTag(), > xmlOutput.data(myBean) > Advantage: works with scripts. > > - currently: jelly-sql can only define variables with the current > result-sets > Instead, the result-set could be given as data and the latter be > transformed by some other tags > (e.g. a tag that would merge the fields, or extract the only > interesting ones). > > Overall, the idea is to have the ability for a tag to give "return > value" that is not XML. > > I could produce many more scenarios. Most probably that should affect > UseBeanTag... though maybe not at first launch. I would propose to > enrich XMLOutput class itself (by adding the method doing the default > toString). This should really bother the release, I believe. Then I'd > like to concentrate on using this jelly-swing, with the hope to be able > to make a jelly-swing-runner as a browser (maybe for jelly-swing 1.1 or > so). > > paul > > Le 6 oct. 04, à 00:05, Dion Gillard a écrit : > > > > > I'm not sure I understand what the use of this method is for Tags and > > TagLibraries, since it's on XML output. > > > > Can you give us an idea? > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 21:31:08 +0200, Paul Libbrecht > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Dear Jellyers, > >> > >> I'd like to propose an addition to the XMLOutput class, used > >> throughout > >> Jelly: > >> a method called data() (or object) accepting any object. > >> > >> By default... take the toString and call characters... > >> Actually, this is the way it is done with the return value of a Jexl > >> expression as part of a text node. > >> > >> But the interesting comes in the non-default case: > >> - a math library could return a polynomial or numerical type... and > >> this could then be further evaluated by parents > >> - the arg element of jelly could actually avoid special treatment as > >> it > >> has currently > >> - most of my interest applies for jelly-swing: the components would > >> then want to call data(component) on the xmlOutput. The latter could > >> be > >> filtered by constraint-tags to call data(component-with-constraints). > >> Finally, container tags could, also, filter, and receive the resulting > >> data and add it. > >> > >> I would look forward to comments ! > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
