On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 17:42 -0400, Sandy McArthur wrote: > On 10/24/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > unless some one beats me to it, once the patch is available i'll add > > myself to the dev list and review (as time permits). > > Patches submitted.
committed. many thanks :) > > > While I'm at it would it be desirable to transition to the privately > > > head lock idiom > > it might (however) stop a user doing something equivalent through > > carelessness or naivity. so probably worth doing. would need to add a > > note to the documentation since this would change the semantics. > > opinions? > > I have a number of pending patches: http://tinyurl.com/cauwd that I'd > like to see commited or rejected as I'm starting to feel no one cares > about them and it's becoming a pain to maintain my own patched pool > version. most of the committers listed in the project.xml aren't that active in the commons any more :-/ re: 33264, 36719, 36904, 37153 these all suffer from issues with backward compatibility. i'd like to have a little think and then move the discussion to a new thread. > After that I'd be willing to implement the transition to the > private lock idiom. as sebb noted, this needs a little more consideration. i'd like to move it to a new thread. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
