On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 00:07 +0200, Santiago Gala wrote: > El vie, 06-05-2005 a las 10:03 -0400, Ted Husted escribió: > > On 5/5/05, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > El jue, 05-05-2005 a las 16:11 -0400, Ted Husted escribió: > > > > When you hook up Confluence with JIRA and Subversion, things start to > > > > get very, very tasty. > > > > > > Am I the only one that is worried because both JIRA and Bugzilla are > > > dark matter WRT search engines? > > > > > > I mean, it used to be easy to find information about bugs in mail lists, > > > but now, with so called bug-tracking systems, it is more and more > > > difficult. I'd call them both bug-hiding systems. > > > > The SOP should be for the issue trackers to log all changes to [EMAIL > > PROTECTED] > > What is SOP? dict.org is no help
Standard Operating Procedure. It puzzled me for a while too. > > > > > If that is happening, then it should be just as easy to find a > > reference to an pending or resolved issue as it is to find any other > > post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > True. JIRA does the right thing provided the changes are sent into a > public list. Bugzilla, IIRC, is usually configured so that only > assignee, reporter and other people commenting get copies, and this is > definitely bad. This is what gnome, mozilla and other bugzilla installs > do. Well, as far as I know Apache bugzilla installations always email everything to an appropriate dev list. Bugreports for jakarta-commons and jakarta-bcel certainly do. So while it may well be a valid complaint for gnome/mozilla, as far as I know it isn't an issue for Apache users. Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
