Peter Drake wrote:
On Jun 6, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Rémi Coulom wrote:
Also, if you have a clever probability distribution, the range of
values for each move will be very large. For instance, here are two
3x3 shapes used by Crazy Stone (# to move):
O O #
# . .
# O #
Gamma = 143473;
. # #
. . .
. . .
Gamma = 20;
Playing in the empty corner has gamma = 1. So that would be a lot of
tickets to distribute.
Is this distribution something like the number of times a given move was
played in your training set?
No. It is explained in my Amsterdam paper:
http://remi.coulom.free.fr/Amsterdam2007/
Doesn't the "play in empty space" pattern swamp everything else?
No. Gamma = 214 for that one.
Rémi
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
