The only fair way: Limit it to 150W/contestant. ;)
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Erik van der Werf <erikvanderw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lukasz' current rule gives a big advantage to i7 (low core count, 2 threads > per core, high clock rate, all the opposite for Opteron systems). In my > experience performance per thread per GHz for a fully loaded system is quite > similar for a wide range of processor types (I tested this for Opteron, i7 > and an older core2). > > Erik > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:31 AM, David Fotland <fotl...@smart-games.com> > wrote: >> >> 2 threads is not worth nearly as much as two cores. >> >> >> >> David >> >> >> >> From: computer-go-boun...@dvandva.org >> [mailto:computer-go-boun...@dvandva.org] On Behalf Of Erik van der Werf >> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 2:09 PM >> >> >> To: computer-go@dvandva.org >> Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Kas Cup >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Łukasz Lew <lukasz....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I'm assuming that hyperthreading is OK, so a core i7 would count as 4 >> > cores, but use 8 threads. >> >> Yes. >> >> >> >> So what about AMD cores? What about overclocking? >> >> >> >> I think limiting on nr_of_threads X clock_rate would be more fair. >> >> >> >> Erik >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Computer-go mailing list >> Computer-go@dvandva.org >> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@dvandva.org > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@dvandva.org http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
