>Hi Aja, > >Of course, H4 is by far better than H2. But there's still Ko at the >upper left corner from B, >that is, C8, D8, A8, C9, A6, B5, B9. The Pro left this Ko >intentionally, and Zen got mixed up.
I believe Zen didn't mix-up. Increasing (potential) Ko positions increases "branch factor" a lot and shallower the search tree due to read Ko threats, even if the simulations manage the Ko correctly. This could be more difficult problem than "leave multiple unsolved groups" strategy to solve. Hideki > -- Masa > >2012/12/3 Aja Huang <ajahu...@gmail.com>: >> 2012/12/2 Erik van der Werf <erikvanderw...@gmail.com> >>> >>> It doesn't look that easy to me. Have you tried playing it against Erica? >> >> >> No, I haven't set up Erica in this laptop. >> >> Another question: how about W H4 instead of H2 for move 28? The corner looks >> completely alive to me. Even if B has a killing method, it's not easy anyway >> and that is much better than the unresisting "sudden death" as Zen played in >> the game. >> >> These 9x9 games, Zen vs. pros, show that L&D, like semeai, is still far from >> an unsolved problem in MCTS. >> >> Aja >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Computer-go mailing list >> Computer-go@dvandva.org >> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >_______________________________________________ >Computer-go mailing list >Computer-go@dvandva.org >http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go -- Hideki Kato <mailto:hideki_ka...@ybb.ne.jp> _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@dvandva.org http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
