OK, so I didn't wait for urpmi to complete before I asked the question. I see that the original package is k3b, not libk3b, and that the conflict is with one file. /usr/lib/libk3bcore.so.1.0.0
Still, the question remains what is the correct resolution here? Force installation of libk3b? tony ########################################### On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:06:22 -0400 Tony Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm doing a first pass cooker update after installing 9.2RC1 from iso images. > The screen log trace says that libk3b1-0.9-9mdk conflicts with an earlier version > (libk3-0.9.9mdk?) and the package installation fails. > > /var/log/urpmi.log does not contain the failure information. rpm query now shows > no libk3 at all. I assume that it was removed as a part of the process, or that > the rpm db entry was removed, or something else, leaving me confused. > > So my questions are: > 1. was libk3 really removed, or what? > 2. is that k3 vs k3b (or was it k3b vs k3b1?) a version evolution naming > convention, and if so, which one should I be installing? > > tony >
