ping
On 12 March 2014 12:29, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote: > This is a request for review of this bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033662 > and the duplicate: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033659 > > The javadoc of the method java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter::withZone says: > "If no zone has been parsed, then this override zone will be included > in the result of the parse where it can be used to build instants and > date-times." > However, the implementation doesn't obey this. > > This is a very unfortunate bug that makes some date-time parsing a lot harder. > > A second related bug in an egde case - not properly handling a > ChronoZonedDateTime from TemporalField.resolve - is also tested for > and fixed. > > > Proposed patch: > https://gist.github.com/jodastephen/9505761 > The patch includes no spec changes. > The patch includes new and refactored TCK tests. The new tests for > withZone() and withChronology() are based on the spec. > > I need a reviewer and a committer please. > thanks