On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 05:34:04PM -0800, ron minnich wrote: > Note one thing the arrays in the individual files got you. You > could drag along ALL types of a (e.g.) the intel southbridge even > when you only specified one of them in a dts.
*nods* Hopefully we can be smart about this also in the future. > Now, to get all the seperate constructors, you're going to have to > specify that you use all those parts. Not so elegant. But thinking about it a bit, this comes back to the dts. The dts syntax doesn't have a concept of a composite device, so maybe we should not even try to hack around it? > That's why I did the array, I now recall, but it probably confused > everyone, as did this explanation. So never mind. I agree completely with the concept, just not that implementation. :) > It's possible we should just go back to linker sets :-) ewwww. Anything linker may turn out to be troublesome? //Peter -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
