On 07.06.2008 05:47, Ward Vandewege wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 05:37:05AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >> I suspect one of the other probe functions is killing communication with >> the chip. If that's not the case, maybe we don't leave ID mode correctly. >> >> Can you try repeated >> flashrom -c A49LF040A >> (I forgot the exact chipname specification) after a cold boot? >> > > Yeah, that works: > > littleredbox:/usr/src/flashrom3# ./flashrom -c A49LF040A > [...] > Found chip "Amic Technology A49LF040A" (512 KB) at physical address > 0xfff80000. > [...] > No operations were specified. > littleredbox:/usr/src/flashrom3# ./flashrom -c A49LF040A > [...] > Found chip "Amic Technology A49LF040A" (512 KB) at physical address > 0xfff80000. > [...] > No operations were specified. > littleredbox:/usr/src/flashrom3# ./flashrom -c A49LF040A > [...] > Found chip "Amic Technology A49LF040A" (512 KB) at physical address > 0xfff80000. > [...] > No operations were specified. >
Ouch. So one of the other probe functions kills communication. Can one of you try disabling other chip definitions in flashchips.c with #if 0 to narrow this problem down? Regards, Carl-Daniel -- coreboot mailing list coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot