On 09/21/2012 11:28 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Bernhard Voelker wrote: >> I wonder if syntax-check couldn't prevent this ... didn't we have this >> already a few weeks ago? > > Good idea. > It's definitely worth a try. It will depend on how many > false positives there are.
Apropos: the syntax-check failed yesterday, when I tried to add the new test, because the test was not yet in the git history, but sc_tests_list_consistency seemed to check on that. So I committed despite of that error, and a subsequent syntax-check passed. Is this normal behavior? I didn't experience such before the non-recursive work. And this is the first test to be added since then ... (but maybe it was just too late at night for me). Have a nice day, Berny
