Hi Martin,
Well and I for one would be of the pro exit 0 school, so never mind
me. I will jump back in my hole.
jonasbn
On 03/09/2008, at 17.06, David Golden wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Martin Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
I sincerely hope I am misunderstanding the comment "Returning 0
without
having accomplished the primary goal of the Makefile.PL, to
generate a make
file, seems like a serious error/bug" because I only changed my
Makefile.PL
to do exactly that (exit with 0 without generating a Makefile) at
this lists
advice. I also included build_requires, configure_requires etc etc
etc in
the hope of getting successful reports. Please tell me I've
misunderstood
the above comment because I don't think it is fair on module
authors to
continually expect them to make changes that don't stand the test
of time.
Some people have philosophical objections to the "exit 0" trick.
I don't think that trick will be reversed, but we might try to be
smarter for those who object to using it.
So I don't think you'll need to change things yet again. We're not
that cruel. ;-)
David
