On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:25 AM, Hans Dieter Pearcey wrote:
Excerpts from David Golden's message of Fri Oct 09 07:53:50 -0400
2009:
26. Specify a DLSIP resource
Proposal:
DLSIP codes should be specified in META.* as a resource.
My impression of DLSIP is that it's nearly as unused as the modules
list. Is
this inaccurate?
right. people that do bother to register a module do normally set the
columns. but
D - Development Stage - I am not sure anyone ever changes this after
initial registration
L - Language Used - this could be added to META as it could be
relevant to build. ie do you need a C++ compiler etc
S - Support Level - this can sort of be implied by the resources
section in META
I - Interface Style - not sure thats all that interesting. personally
I would rather read the docs+code to determine if I wanted to use a
module
P - Public License - having a single character description is a little
limited. the license field in META is much better
-1
Graham.
