On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:52:05AM -0800, Arthur Corliss wrote: > I think I was quite explicit in saying that efficiencies should be pursued > in multiple areas, but the predominant bitch I took away from your thread > dealt with the burden of synchronizing mirrors. What's the easiest way to > address that pain? I don't believe it's your method. I'd look into the > size issue *after* you address the incredible inefficiencies of a simple > rsync.
"I" You? Or someone else? I am quite happy to agree that your understanding and experience of storage management is better than mine. But that's not the key question, in a volunteer organisation. The questions I ask, repeating Jan's comments in another message, are. Nicholas Clark
