James Robertson writes: Boy, things are really heating up on [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you're not there, you're missing something. > As an Australian, I am more than a little concerned > that an American law enforcement agency is trying > to dictate the design of an international communication > standard. Well, aren't there Oz engineers in the IETF? If there aren't, that's their fault, isn't it? > Does this mean they can wiretap Australian conversations > as well? You never heard of Echelon & consorts? Of course they can. The current debate is whether to make it even easier for them. Personally I don't think on the long run there is any way around of implementing the equivalent for mail mixers for other IP services.
- IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into the Intern... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... John Young
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... Declan McCullagh
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping in... James Robertson
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretappin... Eugene Leitl
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretappin... Damien Miller
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping in... Ted Lemon
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping in... P.J. Ponder
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping in... Russell Nelson
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping in... Steve Reid
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretappin... Declan McCullagh
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... Peter Gutmann
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping in... Allen Ethridge
- Re: IP: IETF considers building wiretapping into t... Steven M. Bellovin