If you'll notice that both political parties have expanded on the NSA's 
mission, scope, and probably funding. I doubt there are any business motives 
here. In fact, it seems to me there are the exact opposite. Though, since much 
of government is now contracted out, I do wonder who this was billed out to? 
Also sorta interesting that the possibility of the NSA contracting a French 
company (Vupen) to find exploits. I always assumed HP, Rapid7, Mandiant, etc 
would do this type of thing and that it would be easier to clear companies in 
the US. 

coderman <coder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Ralph Holz <h...@net.in.tum.de> wrote:
>> Hi Jake,
>>
>> Ian Grigg just made a point on metzdowd that I think is true: if you
>> want to change the NSA, you need to address the [...]
>> [... money] Because the chain goes like this:
>>
>> corporate money -> election campaigns -> representatives -> NSA
>
>
>it should be noted that corporate money influence is currently aimed
>at privacy eroding efforts in myriad manner.
>
>
>you need to change the incentive to result in a privacy enhancing
>impetus like this:
>  corporate money -> election campaigns -> representatives ->
>defunding much NSA/CIA/DoD actvity.
>
>which is implemented not just in US, but all reasonable governments,
>at the same time privacy aware corporations are implementing privacy
>enhancing operations and software. this can be as simple as HTTPS only
>with forward secret suites, or as significant as desired.
>
>
>in other words: it's even more difficult! an effective response
>requires cooperation of most governments and international corporate
>entities.
>
>
>there are tens and tens of billions that could be trimmed from the
>black budget and DoD budget while preserving a minimal, defensive
>force and command, allowing for targeted, HUMINT focused operations to
>replace all wholesale and endemic COMSEC vulnerability exploiting
>efforts.
>
>
>good luck finding the incentive of sufficient force, and defending
>against the significant pushback!
>
>
>best regards,
>_______________________________________________
>cryptography mailing list
>cryptography@randombit.net
>http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to