Cory Shubert wrote: > Hi all, I am throwing our new design out there for critique and > suggestions. > > http://www.nwaworldvacations.com > <BLOCKED::http://www.nwaworldvacations.com> > > We tried to do a better job of CSS and moved into a more Web 2.0 vibe, > ...{trimmed} > > I am posting here to help us continue on that learning curve. > > > Cory > >
Cory, If you mean what you wrote about transitioning to CSS then you may want to /continue to employ tables for the tabular data/. But as of now, it seems to me, you're running a predominately table oriented site with a doctype. The way some of us handle Ajax/JavaScript functionality is to use same with the qualifier the page will work, as well (if not better), without either or both. Your slow page loads may be more part and parcel of the "Web 2,.0 vibe" than a practical CSS issue. Fast load from the CSS perspective, in my opinion, has more to do with lean, mean coding practice. Eliminating inline styles and other table like practices, calling js from an external file, and reducing white space in the source document /may/ help speed things up to a lessor extent. Testing at +1 and +2 font-scaling in compliant browsers is a good idea; and, providing text for IE users without the need for them to jump through hoops to scale it is always advantageous. Best, ~dL -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
