-Caveat Lector-

Mr. Norman,
I agree with you that we should do away with the electoral college
system.
Regards,
William

On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Jim Norman wrote:

>  -Caveat Lector-
>
> Mr. Tun stall,
> I agree with the majority of this post.  My only criticism is the "vote him out of
> office" comment.  I have done some research in this area and can find no reference
> in the US Code, or Florida Statutes that allows for the common man like you and me
> to vote for the President or V-President of the United States.  OH, I know we have
> the popular vote and all that but, it has no force at law.  If any law is passed in
> the several states that would permit Citizens to vote, it would be illegal since all
> laws not following the constitution are non laws.  The election of the Pres/V-Pres.
> is outlined in the constitution and all State laws have to conform.
> Kind Regards
> Jim Norman
>
> William Hugh Tunstall wrote:
>
> >  -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > Mr. Stokes,
> > The gentleman claimed that Warren Harding was a great man.  Since he made
> > the claim I was only asking why he believed it to be true.  Not an
> > unreasonable request.
> >
> > Since you're posting on Harding...please be forthcoming.  What information
> > can you shed on the subject?  None, I guess.  Then, you shift over to the
> > subject of President Clinton..
> >
> > First off, he is not my hero. He wasn't my first choice.  I wanted someone
> > who would address the collapse of American manufacturing and stop our
> > slide into globalism.  Clinton is really a product of the DNC, a group
> > that has a strong corporate/globalist orientation interested in pushing
> > through NAFTA and GATT, two trade measures I opposed.  So, I'm not
> > happy with him.
> >
> > I'm an economic nationalist.  Since you seem to be free with the term,
> > "traitor," I think it is just short of treasonous for American
> > corporations to continue using slave labor around the world, close down
> > plants in America, open up operations in hellholes around the world, then
> > bring their shoddy, slave-labor products back into the US to sell them at
> > inflated prices.  That is irresponsible and in my book,
> > because
> > they are undercutting the economic well-being of working families here in
> > the United States.  This policy of globalization has been pushed by both
> > political parties (Republicans champion it as well as Democrats).  Clinton
> > is just continuing the policies of his predecessors (going back to
> > Nixon--a Republican president--who championed an open door policy to
> > China.)
> >
> > Of course, I believe that we need to develop peaceful trading policies
> > with other countries..but not at the expense of our own people.
> > On this point, we have serious philosophical differences.  I believe that
> > everyone--both labor and the business sector must pursue policies that
> > further the common good--by that I mean, they should pursue economic
> > policies that further the best interests of their own country.  We could
> > learn from the Japanese on this point.  The Japanese business class does
> > not impoverish their own
> > workers in order to make a quick buck like we will do.  They are
> > profoundly patriotic.  They're not interested in undercutting the economic
> > well-being of their own people.  Nor do they craft trade policies
> > that are in the worst interests of their own fellow citizens.  As a
> > result, they don't have the kind of rancorous class divisions we have
> > here...
> > Of course, the analogy falls apart when you consider that they are a
> > homogeneous society...without the racial/ethnic/religious/ divisions..
> > but their professional elites (the most privileged members of their
> > system) do not seek to impoverish their own citizens.
> >
> > Examples: Nike, Boeing, General Electric, General Motors,...a long list of
> > manufacturers, food producers, etc.
> >
> > >From my own personal experience in my former community of Mayfield,
> > Kentucky...three manufacturing
> > industries were closed up and moved overseas (Dillon Manufacturing,
> > Mary-Nell and a boot company whose name I've forgotten).
> >
> > You called President
> > Clinton a "traitor." Walk the walk yourself, sir.
> > Be specific. The sale of missile technology to the Chinese? I agree with
> > you.  That was a disastrous policy...but those technology transfers
> > originated in the Bush administration, an administration that has had an
> > interest in promoting closer ties with China.  So, all Clinton has been
> > doing is carrying out the foreign policy measures of his Republican
> > predecessors...
> >
> > Personally, I think it is a mistake to share technology with the Chinese.
> > But since both the Republican and Democratic administrations have approved
> > these sales...they were reviewed by the NSA and the State Department as
> > not posing a threat to the security of the United States...I don't think
> > it can be considered a "treasonous" act.  Unless you want to argue that
> > President Bush was a traitor to the country as well.
> >
> > Presidential accomplishments?  As a Democratic President, he hasn't done
> > much.  I would agree.  In fact, he has more or less kept the nation on the
> > same foreign policy course that the Republican party has wanted.  Both
> > Republicans and Democrats want a stable world order with Wall Street and
> > London banks at the helm. (a policy which involves giving lip service to
> > domestic problems here at home, while they carry out the bidding of their
> > corporate masters..)  Since the policy of globalization continues
> > forward..Republicans are happy because it means an expansion of business
> > abroad.  Labor unions are pretty much kept in check... The minority
> > community is pacified with token representation...and there is some
> > token appearance of political representation for the nation's working
> > people.
> >
> > Maybe your particular political agenda isn't advanced (whatever that might
> > be), but for the most part, he has managed to keep up the illusion that
> > the nation isn't falling to pieces...that we can continue to run these
> > trade deficits without wrecking the economy...and that working people will
> > remain passive.  So far, the formula has worked well.  No real labor
> > unrest...the ghettos aren't exploding.. profits are up..and the most
> > affluent sector of the American economy is doing very very well.  So that
> > is why this impeachment drive doesn't interest our fellow citizens.  Oh
> > yes, and I might add that unemployment is low. Of course, people have to
> > work two jobs to survive..but there are jobs.
> >
> > No. I am not a Clintonite.  His behavior was disgusting...and he has let
> > down the American people.  If you had read my earlier posts, you would
> > know that I'm not crazy about him.  But I have defended him because I
> > don't like the idea of character assassination and smear campaigns....
> >
> > I remember listening to Limbaugh one afternoon make a joke about Chelsea
> > Clinton....that there were two "dogs" in the White House.  To attack the
> > President's daughter is indefensible.  But that is the kind of hate
> > campaign that has been directed against the man and his family since his
> > election.  If you don't like the man, vote him out.  The fact that
> > Gingrich is gone....and Clinton's continued popularity suggests that
> > most Americans dislike the tactics of his political enemies more than
> > they dislike his personal behavior.  The Republican party has made a
> > serious miscalculation...and if they want to win in 2000, they will have
> > to come up with some programs/issues that the American people can support,
> > or they will lose again.
> >
> > On Sat, 9 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >  -Caveat Lector-
> > >
> > > In a message dated 99-01-05 12:12:29 EST, you write:
> > >
> > > <<
> > >  Since you admire Mr. Harding, would you please share with us some of the
> > >  great man's accomplishments?  What exactly did Warren do?
> > >
> > >  How did President Harding revolutionize and transform American society?
> > >  In 1999, do we speak of "the Harding vision" or "the Harding effect"?
> > >
> > >  (Did he pull the nation out of a depression?  Did he fight for the
> > >  protection of the civil liberties of all Americans? Did he build a
> > >  national highway system?
> > >
> > >  Was he witty? wise? profound?  Perhaps, we need a book devoted to him:
> > >  "The Wit and Wisdom of President Warren Harding."
> > >  But I don't mean to be unkind. He must have done something memorable. Or
> > >  perhaps his special genius, like so many Republicans, was in the
> > >  NOT-DOING.
> > >
> > >
> > >  Regards,
> > >  Wm
> > >   >>
> > >       Sounds a lot like Clinton except Clinton doesn't know how to definr the
> > > word "IS" and Clinton is a traitor.  Seems to me I have asked these same
> > > questions about your King... Clinton... what has this low-life done that is so
> > > spectacular??? Still waiting for an answer from the Clintonites.  But, I don't
> > > mean to be unkind... just truthful, I'm not like youe lying hero Clinton.
> > >
> > > No Regards,
> > > To those who can't "walk the walk"
> > >
> > > Bob Stokes
> > >
> > > DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> > > ==========
> > > CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
> > > screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
> > > and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
> > > frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
> > > spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> > > gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
> > > be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> > > nazi's need not apply.
> > >
> > > Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> > > ========================================================================
> > > Archives Available at:
> > > http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
> > >
> > > http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> > > ========================================================================
> > > To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> > > SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> > > SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Om
> > >
> >
> > DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> > ==========
> > CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
> > screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
> > and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
> > frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
> > spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> > gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
> > be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> > nazi's need not apply.
> >
> > Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> > ========================================================================
> > Archives Available at:
> > http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
> >
> > http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> > ========================================================================
> > To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> > SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> > SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Om
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
> frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
>

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to