Re: [CTRL] Webfairy

Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:55:59 -0700

-Caveat Lector-
This is a voluminous email on Webfairy's antics of the past and I suggest that anyone wanting to know more about here read all of it.  At one time she pressed to meet me and I am now glad I didn't.  I came frightfully close once.
 
At the very least, the following snips, all from emails she posted to my ex-Yahoogroup, Psy-Op, show just how unscientific and illogical is her deductive process.  Still, I cannot find the references to the close-up of an object with black and white tiles.  It is possible that I saw it in a private email from her.
 
A snip from an email quoting Webfairy, an email posted by Paul Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (as my list was hacked, the original email addresses are hidden even from me - remote password change) follows.  You are welcome to browse the list to see that at no time did Webfairy take exception to all of this.  She did not deny, at any point, having said these words but continued in a long, ongoing discussion although it does seem that she is referring to frames posted at artbell.com and not the frames on her site (much more interesting stuff on Webfairy follows):
 
 
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:10:33 -0600
From: The Webfairy
Subject: Re: Thomas Paine and Snake Plissken bring us back from North Tower
to the Pentagon and the real case against the government.


Huh? First, I'm a she. A 50 year old grandmother in Chicago,
disabled by a hip replaced twice.
I'm not connected to any intelligence apparatus except my own brain.
I too have been researching this situation 7 days a week and full
time since 9-13, when Bush made his warmonger speech instead of
comforting the nation.

Second, there is an IMMENSELY PECULIAR Something on that tape.
Immensely peculiar.
I have all the frames split out in a 640x480 size format, and the
Whatever is very peculiar, and Very there.

If you need a "smoking gun" it is there in the stills from that
tape.
This is my detailed analysis after studying the blow-ups of the
single frames, as posted to CIA-Drugs last night:
****************
Very wierd is putting it mildly.

There's one frame where the sucker appears to back up!
It seems to emerge intact, leaving a shadow that is cigar shape like
the artbell thing at
http://artbell.com/graphics19.html

I'd guess whatever that video caught is what this video caught, but
from farther away, and going in at an incredible speed.
I exported the frames at 30 frames per second.
The whatever it us appears in the first frame the camera caught
after turning the camera toward the WTC. The first few frames
showing it, it is HAULING ASS. The first 12 frames showing it show
significant movement (at least the width of the thing worth of
movement per frame) then it um, backs up during one frame.
Then it's movement is significantly slower...it takes two frames to
show movement. Then it takes 3 frames to show movement, and then it
hits.
There are 40 frames between the spot where it backs up and where it
disappears into the building. This is less distance than it covered
in the first 12 frames in which it was visable, before it "backs
up."
 
~~~
 
 
From:  The Webfairy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:  Wed Mar 13, 2002  3:34 pm
Subject:  Re: [APFN] Just One Problem with Specualtions on Flight 11 and the North Tower
 
*no* 757 or any other plane we know about moves 5 times faster than
the speed of a fireball.
NONE.
Yet that's what this video shows, once split up into individual
stills.
I have irfanview, a free file viewer, with which I stepped through
the frames.
The *whatever it is* showed significant movement IN EVERY FRAME
until it gets *very* close to the building, at which time it takes
tow frames to show movement, and then three. To see any movement in
the smoke or flames takes 5 frames at least.

This whatever it is is *really, really streaking.*
http://www.taner.net/wtc/media/First_Plane_Crash_SLOW_.mpeg

I think this whatever it is is moving plenty fast to cause a sonic
boom.
 
~~~
 
The following is copied from:
[Fwd: FW: WTC1 or the WHATZIT of the EMPIRE]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/psy-op/message/6467
 
From:  The Webfairy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:  Wed Apr 17, 2002  12:43 am
Subject:  [Fwd: FW: WTC1 or the WHATZIT of the EMPIRE]
 
From: Barbara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FW: WTC1 or the WHATZIT of the EMPIRE
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
added more blowups of the craft parts and scenario that Webfairy
did of the
stills of the WTC 1 event..... there ofcourse is much more.. hope
you all
can see some of what i put up..enlarged and cut apart to view .....
granted
these are strange reptilian craft.. we are NOT used to seeing.. yet
there is
much that we should be able to recognize from our so called X
rulers........and the symbology that they utilize
'
http://www.wiolawapress.com/signature.htm
 
~~~
 
Next, Webfairy claims that the plane that hit the building is something other than the "whatzit" and that the building was hit twice, once by "each" object:
 
 
From:  The Webfairy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:  Thu Mar 28, 2002  3:46 am
Subject:  Re: onelove~ Why is this building burning before the plane hit it???
 
These scenes from the fireman video show the other side of the
building.
Notice the pattern of damage developing on
http://thewebfairy.com/whatzit/22.html

*THAT* is the damage that developed just a little more before the
plane hit. It got past the dustball stage and flamed up by the time
the plane hit.

At least I know this plane actually hit the building, and is not a
missing plane.

This is the first time I have seen the hit from this angle.
http://www.navexpress.com/911/26.htm

It is hitting the building after the Whatzit did it's damage, and
appears to be a "rider truck" coverup for the secret Whatzit.
AND
 
 
From:  The Webfairy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:  Thu Mar 28, 2002  1:23 am
Subject:  softball sized fusion bombs?
 
http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/geo/analysis.htm According
to one of my sources, Iraq possesses "s-megaton" micro-nuclear
warheads. These are
softball-sized two-megaton fusion bombs triggered by an irradiated
and compressed compound of mercury
antimony oxide. This device doubles the nuclear yield with a
hundredfold reduction of weight. Using heavy
hydrogen instead of uranium or plutonium to fuel its explosive
reaction, this hand-held nuclear weapon cannot
be detected by U.S. sensors.
http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/geo/analysis.htm

softball size fusion bombs?

Any chance this could account for the eruption of multiple discrete
"dustballs" from the Whatzit that hit WTC 1?
 
~~~
 
 
From:  The Webfairy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:  Tue Mar 19, 2002  7:34 pm
Subject:  Re: onelove~ WTC-1 strange flying object
 
I don't think this object was noticed at the time at all.
http://thewebfairy.com/whatzit

shows images of the WTC1 impact rendered at 30 frames per second.
The whatzit is visable in 9x5 frames. That's a second and a half.

Whatever it is is *NOT* a plane, at least not in the sense of planes
as we understand them.
~~~
 
 
From:  The Webfairy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:  Mon Mar 18, 2002  10:00 pm
Subject:  Re: onelove~ WTC-1 strange flying object
I expect that both buildings were destroyed by weapons they don't
want us to know about. Different weapons, tho:
The Pentagon explosion was a Bright white Flash and roiling fire.
 
~~~
 
Scroll down for more comments by yours truly and items Webfair posted to my now defunct list.
 
In a message dated 8/23/2004 12:20:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Caveat Lector-


On Aug 23, 2004, at 7:58 PM, Adam Bruce wrote:

> -Caveat Lector-
>  While I do not doubt what you have provided here, I would like to
> state something for clarity's sake:
>  
> If Webfairy got these images directly from an actual film of the
> "attack" then the initial images were either doctored or invented (the
> first images she provided showed a close up of something with great
> detail though it looked ridiculous).  We are also left with the
> question of why in the images she provides there is a series from one
> frame to the next, in what is currently available at her website,
>  where the object actually jumps BACKWARD for a single frame, then
> resumes its course forward.  Is this not evidence of tampering?

i have seen nothing that looks like the object jumping backwards for
one frame in the naudet DVD version of the first footage, which is the
benchmark.  can you point me to the best example of a file that shows
this 'jump'?  this certainly deserves a careful look as possible
evidence of tampering by somebody or other.
Here are some items of interest, all posted by Webfairy and all archived at my list at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/psy-op/
 
Reptile caught shapeshifting?
 
Nazi War on Cancer
 
Unfair FAIR and Unfree Pacifica
 
Is Cannibalism a Religious Experience
 
EXCERPTS FROM THE BOOK ADOLF HITLER FOUNDER OF ISRAEL
 
 
~
 
By the way, on two different occasions wherein I have Webfairy alternate addresses online to reach me at more securely, those accounts were hacked beyond my ability to access and both were within a matter of two days.
 
Also, if you can believe it, she claimed at one time that the buildings collapsed because of the use of a scalar beam that "sliced" the building in two.
 
From:  The Webfairy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:  Sun Mar 31, 2002  9:18 pm
Subject:  Disintegration and other wild physics experiments
 
 
~
 
 
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Wed Feb 27, 2002  1:09 am
Subject:  Why the Moon landings were faked
 
~
 
 
From:  The Webfairy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:  Mon Feb 25, 2002  1:39 am
Subject:  National Enquirer Enron Article
 
~
 
 
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Fri Feb 8, 2002  5:35 am
Subject:  Necronomicon FAQ.htm
 
~
 
What do YOU think?
 
*
 
www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to