-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

from:
http://www.prouty.org/
Click Here: <A HREF="http://www.prouty.org/">The Col. L. Fletcher Prouty
Reference Site</A>
-----

Appendix C

NSC 5412, "National Security Council Directive
on Covert Operations"




A segment of NSC 5412 follows below. Known as the Special Group 5412/2, this
subcommittee of the National Security Council was the descendant of the
Special Group 10/2 which, as described in "The Forty Committee" by L.
Fletcher Prouty[1], produced a document, NSCID 10/2, that "came close to
giving the CIA what it wanted" in terms of being able to conduct clandestine
operations. NSC 5412, "National Security Council Directive on Covert
Operations," effectively neutralized such oversight functions as were
intended to be carried out under the authority of the Operations Coordinating
Board (OCB) which was a part of NSC by law. OCB was intended to be a group of
senior individuals, who would follow the decisions made by the National
Security Council and make sure that the bureaucracy carried them out.

The following is taken from pages 308-310 of The U.S. Government and the
Vietnam War, Executive and Legislative Roles and Relationships, Part I,
1945-1961, prepared for the Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate, by
the Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, printed by the U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, 1984. Also important to note here is
the wording that defined "covert operations."

Although there had been some covert U.S. operations in Indochina during
Truman's administration, which had been continued by Eisenhower, the approval
of NSC 5412 on March 15, 1954, marked the official recognition and
sanctioning of a much larger program of anti-Communist activities in
Indochina and throughout the world.[81]

NSC 5412, "National Security Council Directive on Covert Operations," which
continued to be the U.S. Government's basic directive on covert activities
until the Nixon administration's NSC 40 in 1970, began with this statement of
purpose:

The National Security Council, taking cognizance of the vicious covert
activities of the USSR and Communist China and the governments, parties and
groups dominated by them . . . to discredit and defeat the aims and
activities of the United States and other powers of the free world,
determined, as set forth in NSC directives 10/2 and 10/5 [of the Truman
administration], that, in the interests of world peace and U.S. national
security, the overt foreign activities of the U.S. Government should be
supplemented by covert operations. . . .

The NSC has determined that such covert operations shall to the greatest
extent practicable, in the light of U.S. and Soviet capabilities and taking
into account the risk of war, be designed to
a. Create and exploit troublesome problems for International Communism,
impair relations between the USSR and Communist China and between them and
their satellites, complicate control within the USSR, Communist China and
their satellites, and retard the growth of the military and economic
potential of the Soviet bloc.

b. Discredit the prestige and ideology of International Communism, and reduce
the strength of its parties and other elements.

c. Counter any threat of a party or individuals directly or indirectly
responsive to Communist control to achieve dominant Power in a free world
country.

d. Reduce International Communist control over any areas of the world.

e. Strengthen the orientation toward the United States of the peoples and
nations of the free world, accentuate, wherever possible, the identity of
interest between such peoples and nations and the United States as well as
favoring, where appropriate, those groups genuinely advocating or believing
in the advancement of such mutual interests, and increase the capacity and
will of such peoples and nations to resist International Communism.

f. In accordance with established policies and to the extent practicable in
areas dominated or threatened by International Communism, develop underground
resistance and facilitate covert and guerrilla operations and ensure
availability of those forces in the event of war, including wherever
practicable provisions of a base upon which the military may expand these
forces in time of war within active theaters of operations as well as
provision for stay-behind assets and escape and evasion facilities.

NSC 5412 defined "covert operations" as " . . . all activities conducted
pursuant to this directive which are so planned and executed that any U.S.
Government responsibility for them is not evident to unauthorized persons and
that if uncovered the U.S. Government can plausibly disclaim any
responsibility for them. Specifically, such operations shall include any
covert activities related to: propaganda, political action; economic warfare;
preventive direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition;
escape and evasion and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states
or groups including assistance to underground resistance movements,
guerrillas and refugee liberation groups; support of indigenous and
anti-communist elements in threatened countries of the free world; deceptive
plans and operations; and all activities compatible with this directive
necessary to accomplish the foregoing. Such operations shall not include:
armed conflict by recognized military forces, espionage and counterespionage,
nor cover and deception for military operations."

To approve and coordinate most covert operations, (some were required to be
approved by the President), NSC 5412 established what became known as the
5412 Committee, also given the nonspecific title, the "Special Group," to
reduce chances of exposure. (In 1964, after the term "Special Group" became
known, the Group was called the 303 Committee. In 1970, it was renamed the 40
Committee.) The 5412 Committee and its successors consisted of the Deputy
Under Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the President's
Special Assistant for National Security Affairs, and the Director of the CIA,
with the latter serving as the Group's "action officer." In 1957, the
Chairman of the JCS also became a member.

------------------------------------------------------------------------


81. NSC 5412 was declassifed in 1977, and is located at the National
Archives, RG 273. It will be published in a future volume of FRUS.








------------------------------------------------------------------------


1.  "The Forty Committee", by L. Fletcher Prouty, Genesis, February, 1975,
pp.28, 105-108,
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/40Comm.html





Next | ToC | Prev

=====
Appendix D

Krulak Letter Re: Dealey Plaza Photos And Lansdale Identity

------------------------------------------------------------------------

VICTOR H. KRULAK

15 March 1985
Mr. Fletcher Prouty
Alexandria, Virginia
Dear Fletch:
          As I read your interesting letter it is plain that you have not
wanted for interest or achievement in your life. It has to have been exciting
and rewarding too.

          Mine has been a lively existence too. I had much to do with Vietnam
from '64 to '68, and was loudly disenchanted with what went on and how. I
recorded it as part of my book First to Fight that came out a few months ago.

          I've also spent ten years in the newspaper business (a most useful
education) and now write a syndicated weekly column. I wrote another book, Org
anization for National Security that resulted in my testifying before a
Senate committee.

          All taken together, a stirring life.

          As to your chronicle concerning the JFK assassination period, I
remember your going to Antarctica. I was in the Pentagon at the time of the
tragedy but have no recollection of where Lansdale was.

          The pictures.-- The two policemen are carrying shotguns, not
rifles. Their caps are different (one a white chinstrap, one black). One has
a Dallas police shoulder patch, one does not and their caps differ from that
of another police officer in photo 4. Reasonable conclusion -- they are
either reservists or phonys. And, as you know, city cops don't have anything
to do with Sheriff's offices.

          As to photo no. 1. That is indeed a picture of Ed Lansdale. The
haircut, the stoop, the twisted left hand, the large class ring. It's
Lansdale. What in the world was he doing there? Has anyone ever asked him and
who was the photographer? Why did he take the pictures? What did he do with th
em?

          I have examined my own records and find no clue that would help.
Suffice to say, it is a fascinating proposition.

          I am returning your pictures.

          Best regards always.

Sincerely,

[signed, Brute Krulak]



VHK: jm
Enclosures
=====
Appendix E

Copies of NSAMs 55, 56, and 57

Contained herein are copies of National Security Action Memorandum Numbers 55,
 56, and 57 taken from Fletcher's own files when working in the Pentagon. As
was his standard operating procedure, he xeroxed and saved copies of these
for his own files at the point when he briefed the Joint Chiefs of Staff on
them (see page 170).

------------------------------------------------------------------------





NSAM No. 55
------------------------------------------------------------------------


THE  WHITE  HOUSE
                                       WASHINGTON
June 28, 1961


NATIONAL SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 55
TO:     The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff

SUBJECT:    Relations of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the President
in Cold War Operations


              I wish to inform the Joint Chiefs of Staff as follows with
regard
to my views of their relations to me in Cold War Operations:


    a.  I regard the Joint Chiefs of Staff as my principal military
advisor responsible both for initiating advice to me and for res-
ponding to requests for advice. I expect their advice to come to
me direct and unfiltered.
    b.  The Joint Chiefs of Staff have a responsibility for the defense
of the nation in the Cold War similar to that which they have in con-
ventional hostilities. They should know the military and paramilitary
forces and resources available to the Department of Defense, verify their
readiness, report on their accuracy, and make appropriate recommen-
dations for their expansion and improvement. I look to the Chiefs to
contribute dynamic and imaginative leadership in contributing to the
success of the military and paramilitary aspects of Cold War programs.
    c.  I expect the Joint Chiefs of Staff to present the military view-
point in governmental councils in such a way as to assure that the
military factors are clearly understood before decisions are reached.
When only the Chairman or a single Chief is present, that officer
must represent the Chiefs as a body, taking such preliminary and
subsequent actions as may be necessary to assure that he does in
fact represent the corporate judgement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.











------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 2 -



    d.  While I look to the Chiefs to represent the military factor with-
out reserve or hesitation, I regard them to be more than military men
and expect their help in fitting military requirements into the over-all
context of any situation, recognizing that the most difficult problem in
Government is to combine all assets in a unified, effective pattern.



[signature of John Kennedy]







cc:     Secretary of Defense
General Taylor

















------------------------------------------------------------------------





NSAM No. 56
------------------------------------------------------------------------


THE  WHITE  HOUSE
                                       WASHINGTON
June 28, 1961


NATIONAL SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 56
TO:     The Secretary of Defense

SUBJECT:    Evaluation of Paramilitary Requirements


The President has approved the following paragraph:

"It is important that we anticipate now our possible future
requirements in the field of unconventional warfare and
paramilitary operations. A first step would be to inventory
the paramilitary assests we have in the United States Armed
Forces, consider various areas in the world where the
implementation of our policy may require indigenous para-
military forces, and thus arrive at a determination of the
goals which we should set in this field. Having determined
the assets and the possible requirements, it would then be-
come a matter of developing a plan to meet the deficit."
The President requests that the Secretary of Defense, in coordina-
tion with the Department of State and the CIA, make such an
estimate of requirements and recommend ways and means to meet
these requirements.

McGeorge Bundy


cc:     Secretary of State
Director, CIA
General Maxwell D. Taylor

C-O-P-Y








------------------------------------------------------------------------





NSAM No. 57
------------------------------------------------------------------------


C O P Y

June 28, 1961


NATIONAL SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 57
TO:     The Secretary of State
The Secretary of Defense
The Director, CIA


The President has approved the attached recommendation:
The Special Group (5412 Committee) will perform the functions
assigned in the recommendation to the Strategic Resources
Group.


McGeorge Bundy


  cc:   General Maxwell D. Taylor

cc:     Mrs. Lincoln
Mr. Smith
Mr. McG. Bundy file




C O P Y








------------------------------------------------------------------------





C O P Y



          RESPONSIBILITY FOR PARAMILITARY OPERATIONS

          1.  For the purpose of this study, a paramilitary operation is
considered to be one which by its tactics and its requirements in
military-type personnel, equipment and training approximates a con-
ventional military operation. It may be undertaken in support of an
existing government friendly to the U.S. or in support of a rebel group
seeking to overthrow a government hostile to us. The U.S. may render
assistance to such operations overtly, covertly or by a combination of
both methods. In size these operations may vary from the infiltration
of a squad of guerillas to a military operation such as the Cuban invasion.
The small operations will often fall completely within the normal capa-
bility of one agency; the large ones may affect State, Defense, CIA, USIA
and possibly other departments and agencies.
          2.  In order to conduct paramilitary operations with maximum effec-
tiveness and flexibility within the context of the Cold War, it is
recommended
that current directives and procedures be modified to effect the following:

       a.  Any proposed paramilitary operation in the concept state
will be presented to the Strategic Resources Group for initial con-
sidertation and for approval as necessary by the President. There-
after, the SRG will assign primary responsibility for planning, for
interdepartment coordination and for execution to the Task Force,
department or individual best qualified to carry forward the operation
to success, and will indicate supporting responsibilities. Under
this principle, the Department of Defense will normally receive
responsibility for overt paramilitary operations. Where such an
operation is to be wholly covert or disavowable, it may be assigned
to CIA, provided that it is within the normal capabilities of the
agency. Any large paramilitary operation wholly or partly covert
which requires significant numbers of military trained personnel,
amounts to military equipment which exceed normal CIA-controlled
stocks and/or military experience of a kind and level peculiar to the
Armed services is properly the primary responsibility of the
Department of Defense with the CIA in a supporting role.
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to