-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
-----
Financial Markets


Wall Street Post-Election Blues


You mean it wasn't the President after all?

America�s financial markets can now stop blaming the electoral impasse for
their woes, and start focusing on deteriorating economic fundamentals

WALL STREET had been hoping against hope that a result in the presidential
race would spark a stockmarket rally. But on December 13th, as news spread
that Al Gore had decided to concede, a surge in the New York and Nasdaq
stockmarkets soon faltered. Could it be that all the talk by Wall Street�s
bullish share gurus about the damaging impact of presidential uncertainty was
so much hot air? The real reason for the onset of a bear market in shares has
been a sharp decline in the prospects of many American companies, as the
economy has slowed and sources of fresh capital have dried up.

Profit warnings have become a daily ritual. One by one, companies that had
seemed effortlessly able to meet analysts� expectations have delivered bad
news, and most have been punished by investors for their trouble. As
suppliers complain that bills are not being paid on time by well-known
companies that are using every trick in the book to eke out their profits,
can it be long before even Cisco issues a profit warning�and how will
investors react to their current poster-child proving fallible?

Profits are �falling off a cliff�, says Chuck Hill of First Call, a research
firm. On October 1st, analysts were forecasting profit growth of 15.6% for
the S&P 500 companies in the fourth quarter. Now they expect only 7% growth,
with the outlook worsening by the day. Technology-company profits, expected
to rise by 29% at the start of the quarter, are now tipped to rise by only
10%, says Mr Hill. January, when most results are announced, will be more
miserable than ever�particularly if consumer sentiment continues to
deteriorate. The University of Michigan survey of consumer confidence plunged
sharply this month. November�s retail sales figures, released on December
13th, were much weaker than expected.

Cometh the hour, cometh the man�or so investors hope. The �Greenspan put� is
once again the talk of Wall Street. This mythical financial security first
entered the investment lexicon after the crisis in 1998 over the collapse of
Long-Term Capital Management, a hedge fund. The idea is that the Federal
Reserve can be relied upon in times of crisis to come to the rescue, cutting
interest rates and pumping in liquidity, thus providing a floor for equity
prices. This is similar to a put option that guarantees investors a minimum
price at which they can sell their shares.
Belief that the put is again �in the money� was revived by the speech of the
Fed chairman, Alan Greenspan, on December 5th, which was unusually clear in
its up-beat, �I�m here� message. Since then, futures prices have been
predicting a 50 basis-point cut in short-term interest rates by April.

For all his talk of the perils of irrational exuberance, Mr Greenspan has
been adept at pumping up share prices in the past. Yet this time may prove
too challenging even for his magic. Rate cuts may cause the dollar to weaken,
perhaps leading foreign investors to think twice before buying American
assets. And if the confidence of consumers really has been dented, after
being so strong for so long, they may not respond as readily to a stimulus as
economic models predict�particularly if they start to worry about their
record levels of debt.

Above all, the private firms at the heart of the financial system may have
become too risk-averse to respond to rate-cut promptings. Banks have taken a
close look at their loan portfolios and turned white with fear. Bank of
America, one of the biggest corporate lenders, this week announced yet
another $1 billion debt write-off and the departure of a number of senior
personnel from its lending operations. Mr Greenspan�s appeal�quite remarkable
for a central banker in an economy that is already deep in debt�that banks
�should now guard against allowing the pendulum to swing too far the other
way by adopting policy stances that cut off credit to borrowers with credible
prospects,� may fall on deaf ears.

Prospects are even gloomier in the corporate-debt markets. Mr Greenspan is
right that �the palpable fear that dominated financial markets� in the 1998
liquidity crisis is absent today�for one thing, financial institutions have
more capital and a better idea of what risks are in their portfolios. But the
Fed chairman is surely kidding when he says that �current circumstances are
in no way comparable� to then. Actually, according to the Bank Credit Analyst
newsletter�s respected �Financial Stress Index�, they are even worse: the
risk of financial turbulence has not been this high since the American
banking crisis in 1990 (see chart).

The implosion of the corporate-debt markets has now sucked in the hitherto
low-risk commercial-paper market, in which investment-grade companies do
short-term borrowing. Spreads between blue-chip commercial paper and slightly
lower-grade paper have soared from 25 basis points on November 24th to around
100 points now.

Two main factors are at work, says John Hollyer, a fund manager at Vanguard.
In the first place, the market has expanded rapidly�from $82 billion a year
ago to $140 billion today�as firms squeezed out of the bond market have
sought shorter-term alternative financing. And secondly, there has been a
sharp decline in the creditworthiness of some hitherto blue-chip
borrowers�notably Xerox, which may have avoided bankruptcy only by drawing
down a credit line that it had the foresight (or good fortune) to secure in
happier times. There were 19 downgrades of commercial-paper issuers during
the first nine months of 2000; so far in the fourth quarter there have been
20.

Things are worse still in the high-yield (�junk�) bond market. A new report
by Moody�s, a credit-rating agency, forecasts a sharp increase in junk-bond
defaults over the coming year. Worse still, Moody�s lists a large crowd of
firms that will need to refinance their debt (bonds and bank loans) next
year, and calls into question their ability to do so. There is every chance
that this list will have a similarly depressing effect on the debt markets as
a list of dot.com firms that were running out of cash, published early this
year by Barron�s, had on Nasdaq.

This is not a happy situation for a new president. Nor will Mr Bush�s
enthusiasm for tax cuts reassure investors. And if he seeks comfort from the
fact that the Republican Mr Greenspan is still at the helm, trying to keep
the economy and the markets out of trouble, he should not discuss it with his
father, who still blames the Fed chairman for losing him the 1992 election.
Economist, December 15, 2000
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to