-Caveat Lector-

..............................................................

>From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]
Note:  We store 100's of related "conspiracy posts" at:
http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/oldprojects/recentmail.html

From: "M.A. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Recipient list suppressed>
Subject: Prepare for disappointment
Date: Friday, December 15, 2000 5:18 PM

~~for educational purposes only~~
[Title 17 U.S.C. section 107]

Prepare for disappointment
by Joseph Farah

My, my, my. I knew my column announcing there would
be no honeymoon for George W. Bush would be unpopular,
but I had no idea just how angry his supporters would
be.

Kendall L. David of Rock Island, Ill., didn't mince
any words.

"Well, Mr. Farah, I just decided not to read your
website any longer," he wrote. "I just read your
commentary on Dubya's speech, and I am very disappointed
in you. We have had eight years of criminal behavior in
the White House, and your first commentary is to slam
our 'Great Hope' for a better administration. Thanks
for nothing. Your site will not be visited by me in
the future."

First, let me make one thing clear: There is no doubt
in my mind that George W. Bush's administration will
be better in many ways than the reign of terror
conducted by Bill Clinton and Al Gore in the last
eight years.

No one understands better than I just how bad the Clinton
regime has been. I've covered it for eight long years. I
have been personally victimized by its vindictive,
criminal behavior. But surpassing the Clinton years is,
from my point of view, a very low standard by which to
measure the incoming administration.

Mike C. Sheldon wrote, "Where the heck were you eight
years ago? If the press gave Clinton a 'pass' on criticism
for eight years, were you one of them?"

Where was I? I was doing my job, exposing Clinton from
Day 1. My thanks was an Internal Revenue Service audit
that nearly bankrupted my organization. My offices were
broken into, my phone was tapped, my reporters and editors
were exposed to all manner of harassment and intimidation.
Where was I? I might ask: Where were you?

Yom Blumer of Mason, Ohio, had this to say: "As I wrote
to you immediately after the GOP convention, you seem to
be more happy to stand on principle and lose than to see
the better guy win the election."

Guilty as charged. I will always stand on principle. I
will always tell you the truth. I will always do my job
as a journalist and muckraker, no matter who is in power.
And I won't concern myself with who wins and who loses.
I'll let God sort that out.

Others explained to me that Bush has a secret agenda.
I should be patient, give him time, evaluate the
results.

I don't believe it. I think he intends to do just what
he says. I guess I give the man more credit than many of
his supporters. I think he really does believe he can
fix the government school crisis in this country from
Washington with better programs and more spending. I
think he really believes he can and should salvage the
Social Security scam. I think he really believes one of
the top priorities of his administration should be the
implementation of a federal prescription drug plan.

What bothers me most about Bush's first speech is that
I didn't hear the word "freedom" mentioned once. I didn't
hear any synonyms for it either. George W. Bush clearly
has a statist agenda. The campaign's over. He's telling
us what he really believes, folks. More government, less
freedom. That's his prescription for the next four years.

Some of the angry letters challenged me to explain what
Bush should have said in the first speech -- with the
whole nation watching.

Does anyone remember Ronald Reagan? Does anyone recall
the positive, forward-looking, non-threatening rhetoric
that he employed in such situations?

I would have promised to get government off the backs
of working people in this country -- not with some
insignificant tax break, but with the abolition of
the IRS.

"But Farah," some people say, "he couldn't get that through
the divided Congress. He has only a slim majority in the
House and Dick Cheney as a tie-breaker in the Senate."

Maybe he couldn't pass such a radical action through the
Congress. But, if he couldn't, it would be real clear
to the American people who stopped it. And that's what
Bush needs to do, but won't. Instead, with his compromising
agenda, he is going to squander the small working majority
he has in the Congress and lose it in 2002. Mark my words.

No, folks, don't worry. I'm not going to be beating this
drum daily for the next four years. I'm not going to be
issuing these wake-up calls five days a week. But I
thought it was important for you to hear this message
somewhere.

This country is in need of a radical change of course. George
W. Bush is not going to deliver it. I wish I was wrong. I hope
he proves me wrong. But I'm always going to give you my best
assessment based on the evidence.



Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms Discussion List,
not necessarily endorsed by:
***********************************

Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research a ruling
class/conspiracy research resource for the entire political-ideological
spectrum. **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **
   Explore Our Archive:  <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html>

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to