-Caveat Lector-

visit my web site at  http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon
My ICQ# is 79071904

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 00:40:20 EDT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SNET: Waco Revelations Show True Face of Federal Police

->  SNETNEWS  Mailing List

From:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


     Waco Revelations Show True Face of Federal Police

by Congressman RON PAUL
August 30, 1999
The smoking gun

For years the Clinton Administration, with their willing
allies in Congress and the mainstream press, have parroted
the line that federal law enforcement officials did nothing
wrong in the Branch Davidian stand-off at Waco. Anyone who
questioned the government's official position was relegated
to being either a far-right extremist, a militia kook, or a
follower of the undeniably peculiar David Koresh.

It was just weeks after coming to Congress in 1997,while on
a national television program, that I was asked about the
then-four-year-old case. I responded with the position that
the evidence was overwhelmingly strong that everything was
not as bureaucrats in the Clinton Administration claimed. I
cited recent polling data that indicated that most Americans
simply did not trust the government, and that a goodly
number feared the increasingly commonplace occurrence of
federal agents taking violent action against American
citizens.

Almost immediately the defenders of big government, the
administration and the war on civil liberties launched into
wild hysterics.  I had committed the unpardonable sin of
believing the facts rather than the government spin, which
attempted to justify the murder of innocent children and
untried, uncharged adults

The Attorney General and her minions in Congress maintained
that the conflagration had been a rash act of mass suicide,
ignoring that just hours before the raid those same people
had  requested their phone lines be reconnected. They also
ignored the infrared evidence that government agents, as the
fire was raging on one side of the house, were entering the
home through the back, and that tanks were injecting gases
banned under international treaties.

Now, though, even the most blind followers of the
administration and its policies are left stunned with
revelations that high-ranking FBI officials and others lied
to Congress, hid evidence, broke the law and knowingly
subverted justice.

According to press reports, the recently uncovered evidence
has a clear recording of one FBI agent casually asking for
permission to use highly flammable explosive devices against
citizens of the United States just hours before the inferno
began. The permission was, likewise, casually granted.

These people certainly held peculiar religious beliefs. They
may have even been very odd in their habits and mores. But
they were citizens of the United Sates. Not terrorists or
child molesters - despite early claims by the FBI,
repudiated by the Waco child protective services offices.
They were not drug dealers -a lie told to justify the use of
deadly military force; no drug manufacturing equipment was
ever found or seriously believed to exist.

Worse still for defenders of statism is a growing
recognition that our founding fathers were right when they
prohibited the federal government from being involved in law
enforcement.  In Waco, America has seen the face of the
growing federal police state, with its heavy emphasis on
brute force, military machinery and deadly tactics.

With the veneer being stripped from the myth of federal law
enforcement, Americans are beginning to realize that it is
both unconstitutional and untenable. One cannot have a
legion of heavily armed bureaucrats with unlimited
jurisdiction, the might of the military at their call, and
no accountability, yet expect they will respect civil
liberties.

In Waco, we find the answer to a question that is far more
troubling than as to why certain tactics were used, methods
employed or even the sequence of events leading to all those
deaths. The answer we find is to the question, "Why did this
happen at all?"

"Because we could," we are told.




-> To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?b1ddDh.b2B0gP
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A  -- Learn More. Surf Less.
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
==^================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to