In a message dated 5/20/01 4:31:46 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:


Subj:Experts say Murrah Building damage not done by truck blast alone
Date:5/20/01 4:31:46 PM Central Daylight Time
From:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] (American Patriot Friends Network)
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] (APFN Yahoogroups)




Witnesses heard multiple explosions - Sun May 20 14:39:56 2001
http://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html

    Witnesses heard multiple explosions
    Experts say Murrah Building damage not done by truck blast alone

    By Jon Dougherty - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

    Multiple witnesses reported hearing more than
    one explosion the day the Alfred P. Murrah
    Building in Oklahoma City was bombed, while
    other explosives experts contend that the
    damage done to the building could not have
    been caused by a single bomb placed outside in
    a truck.

    According to excerpts of a new 500-page report
    authored by the Oklahoma City Bombing
    Investigation Commission, led by ex-Oklahoma
    state Rep. Charles Key, "the FBI concluded that
    the damage to the Murrah Building was caused
    by one ammonium nitrate truck bomb, which
    was concealed in a 20-foot Ryder rental truck."

    However, the commission's report said,
    multiple witnesses "have testified to hearing a
    second bomb" go off shortly after 9 a.m. the
    morning of April 19, 1995.

    Furthermore, the report said, "explosives
    experts contend that the extent of the damage to
    the building" -- of which aerial photos showed
    nearly one-third was destroyed -- "could not
    have resulted from a single truck bomb. …"

    A summary of the damage report to the
    building, which was made available exclusively
    to WorldNetDaily, said witness accounts
    regarding the explosions "vary, depending
    upon their location at the time of the bombing."
    And just a few of those accounts were provided
    to WND via the report summary.

    Nevertheless, the accounts cast doubt on the
    federal government's insistence that a single
    ANFO -- ammonium nitrate and fuel oil --
    bomb, driven to the front of the Murrah
    building by convicted bomber Timothy
    McVeigh and, witnesses say, at least one other
    person, caused all of the damage.

    The bombing killed 168 people and injured
    hundreds of others.

    Witness statements

    The commission said a Housing and Urban
    Development employee reported feeling an
    "initial shock" while she was on the ninth floor,
    which "she assumed was an earthquake." A
    "massive explosion then followed" that
    sensation, she said.

    A local CBS affiliate reporter also said she had
    interviewed "a number of people who had
    climbed under their desks to seek shelter." That
    indicates, according to some analysts who agree
    with the commission's conclusions, that another
    device likely exploded -- perhaps in the garage
    area of the Murrah Building -- before the Ryder
    truck bomb, because a "sensation" was felt and
    people had enough time to get under a desk
    before the ANFO explosion.

    Another witness, the report said, "felt a 'boom,'
    then heard a second explosion," while another,
    who "was at a third floor stairwell," also "heard
    a second explosion."

    Bomb numbers, characteristics change

    Initial reports in local media said city and
    county bomb squad personnel, as well as some
    government agents, had discovered up to two
    other unexploded bombs in the building. But
    those reports virtually disappeared a few days
    after the bombing. The sightings of the
    additional bombs were, when reported,
    confirmed by local, state and federal officials.

    The commission's report said Dr. Raymon
    Brown, a seismologist with the Oklahoma
    Geological Survey, "explained how two
    explosions" could be heard or felt by witnesses.

    "He stated that the ground wave [from a single
    explosion -- outside, in front of the building]
    was probably heard first, with an air wave
    following, giving the impression of two
    explosions," the report said. "Because the speed
    of sound is faster in the earth, the ground wave
    arrives early. The air wave follows, which
    allows the explosion to be heard." Other experts
    refuted that explanation.

    As the commission report showed, there were
    discrepancies in witness accounts, seismological
    accounts, and even official federal accounts
    about the bomb's makeup, the shock waves it
    caused and specific characteristics surrounding
    the bomb's size.

    The report said the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco
    and Firearms "reported the blast as being the
    result of a car bomb containing 1,200 pounds of
    â€¦ ANFO. Then, it was reported that the bomb
    weighed 4,000 pounds. The story changed again
    immediately preceding [McVeigh's 1997
    federal] trial [in Denver, Colo.] when it was
    asserted that the bomb was a mixture of
    ammonium nitrate and nitromethane (ANNM),
    weighing 4,800 pounds."

    Also, the commission pointed out, "as rescue
    efforts began, there were reports of other bombs
    being found in the building, causing [it] to be
    evacuated twice" during the early rescue efforts.

    Later, "the government, however, denied that
    any bombs were found within the building, but
    eyewitnesses refuted that contention."

    Reports of other devices

    In an interview with Oklahoma City police and
    fire department officials in the days after the
    bombing, Firehouse Magazine -- a trade journal
    for firefighters -- quoted officials who said "four
    bomb scares" were eventually reported: 10 a.m.,
    10:22 a.m., 10:45 a.m., and 1:51 p.m., all on April
    19, the day of the bombing.

    Furthermore, the commission said, the
    "Oklahoma Final Report," which was issued in
    July 1996 and published by the City of
    Oklahoma, reported two bombs. According to
    this report, the commission noted, "a bomb
    scare occurred at 10:29 a.m. and … 1:30 p.m.,"
    and that "both times the building was
    evacuated."

    In the immediate aftermath of the bombing, Dr.
    Randall Heather, a terrorism expert who was
    being interviewed by local TV station KFOR,
    "was quoted as saying that he was aware that
    the FBI received a [bombing] threat the previous
    week," the report noted.

    "It's a great stroke of luck that we actually have
    got diffused bombs," he told the station,
    because, the commission's report quoted
    Heather as saying, through bomb material "…
    we will be able to track down who committed
    this atrocity."

    Related stories:
    http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22874


    FBI ignores 'John Does'

    FBI refused 22 eyewitness testimonies

    McVeigh, Nichols 'did not act alone'

    Oklahoma City's lost information

    OKC blast linked to bin Laden

    OKC: 'We knew this was going to happen'

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22874

===============================================================
Oklahoma City Bombing Cover-Up
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okc_coverup.htm

The Aryan Republican Army, Elohim City, and the OKC Bombing
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ara_okc.htm

"I'M NOT KEEPING MY MOUTH SHUT ANY LONGER ABOUT OKLAHOMA CITY!"
http://xld.com/public/jdt/jdt5-1.htm

"WE ARE APT TO SHUT OUR EYES AGAINST A PAINFUL TRUTH...
FOR MY PART, I AM WILLING TO KNOW THE WHOLE TRUTH;
TO KNOW THE WORST; AND TO PROVIDE FOR IT."
---- Patrick Henry

Without Justice, there is JUST_US!
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/apfncont.htm


----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from  rly-xa01.mx.aol.com (rly-xa01.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.70])
by air-xa03.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 May 2001 17:31:46
-0400
Received: from  apfn.org (mail11.burlee.com [199.93.70.131]) by
rly-xa01.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 May 2001 17:31:18 -0400
Received: from apfn.org [24.14.28.77] by apfn.org with ESMTP
 (SMTPD32-6.05) id AA5B3180178; Sun, 20 May 2001 16:34:35 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 13:44:25 -0700
From: American Patriot Friends Network <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: http://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: APFN Yahoogroups <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Experts say Murrah Building damage not done by truck blast alone
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit






Witnesses heard multiple explosions - Sun May 20 14:39:56 2001
http://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html

     Witnesses heard multiple explosions
     Experts say Murrah Building damage not done by truck blast alone

     By Jon Dougherty - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

     Multiple witnesses reported hearing more than
     one explosion the day the Alfred P. Murrah
     Building in Oklahoma City was bombed, while
     other explosives experts contend that the
     damage done to the building could not have
     been caused by a single bomb placed outside in
     a truck.

     According to excerpts of a new 500-page report
     authored by the Oklahoma City Bombing
     Investigation Commission, led by ex-Oklahoma
     state Rep. Charles Key, "the FBI concluded that
     the damage to the Murrah Building was caused
     by one ammonium nitrate truck bomb, which
     was concealed in a 20-foot Ryder rental truck."

     However, the commission's report said,
     multiple witnesses "have testified to hearing a
     second bomb" go off shortly after 9 a.m. the
     morning of April 19, 1995.

     Furthermore, the report said, "explosives
     experts contend that the extent of the damage to
     the building" -- of which aerial photos showed
     nearly one-third was destroyed -- "could not
     have resulted from a single truck bomb. …"

     A summary of the damage report to the
     building, which was made available exclusively
     to WorldNetDaily, said witness accounts
     regarding the explosions "vary, depending
     upon their location at the time of the bombing."
     And just a few of those accounts were provided
     to WND via the report summary.

     Nevertheless, the accounts cast doubt on the
     federal government's insistence that a single
     ANFO -- ammonium nitrate and fuel oil --
     bomb, driven to the front of the Murrah
     building by convicted bomber Timothy
     McVeigh and, witnesses say, at least one other
     person, caused all of the damage.

     The bombing killed 168 people and injured
     hundreds of others.

     Witness statements

     The commission said a Housing and Urban
     Development employee reported feeling an
     "initial shock" while she was on the ninth floor,
     which "she assumed was an earthquake." A
     "massive explosion then followed" that
     sensation, she said.

     A local CBS affiliate reporter also said she had
     interviewed "a number of people who had
     climbed under their desks to seek shelter." That
     indicates, according to some analysts who agree
     with the commission's conclusions, that another
     device likely exploded -- perhaps in the garage
     area of the Murrah Building -- before the Ryder
     truck bomb, because a "sensation" was felt and
     people had enough time to get under a desk
     before the ANFO explosion.

     Another witness, the report said, "felt a 'boom,'
     then heard a second explosion," while another,
     who "was at a third floor stairwell," also "heard
     a second explosion."

     Bomb numbers, characteristics change

     Initial reports in local media said city and
     county bomb squad personnel, as well as some
     government agents, had discovered up to two
     other unexploded bombs in the building. But
     those reports virtually disappeared a few days
     after the bombing. The sightings of the
     additional bombs were, when reported,
     confirmed by local, state and federal officials.

     The commission's report said Dr. Raymon
     Brown, a seismologist with the Oklahoma
     Geological Survey, "explained how two
     explosions" could be heard or felt by witnesses.

     "He stated that the ground wave [from a single
     explosion -- outside, in front of the building]
     was probably heard first, with an air wave
     following, giving the impression of two
     explosions," the report said. "Because the speed
     of sound is faster in the earth, the ground wave
     arrives early. The air wave follows, which
     allows the explosion to be heard." Other experts
     refuted that explanation.

     As the commission report showed, there were
     discrepancies in witness accounts, seismological
     accounts, and even official federal accounts
     about the bomb's makeup, the shock waves it
     caused and specific characteristics surrounding
     the bomb's size.

     The report said the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco
     and Firearms "reported the blast as being the
     result of a car bomb containing 1,200 pounds of
     … ANFO. Then, it was reported that the bomb
     weighed 4,000 pounds. The story changed again
     immediately preceding [McVeigh's 1997
     federal] trial [in Denver, Colo.] when it was
     asserted that the bomb was a mixture of
     ammonium nitrate and nitromethane (ANNM),
     weighing 4,800 pounds."

     Also, the commission pointed out, "as rescue
     efforts began, there were reports of other bombs
     being found in the building, causing [it] to be
     evacuated twice" during the early rescue efforts.

     Later, "the government, however, denied that
     any bombs were found within the building, but
     eyewitnesses refuted that contention."

     Reports of other devices

     In an interview with Oklahoma City police and
     fire department officials in the days after the
     bombing, Firehouse Magazine -- a trade journal
     for firefighters -- quoted officials who said "four
     bomb scares" were eventually reported: 10 a.m.,
     10:22 a.m., 10:45 a.m., and 1:51 p.m., all on April
     19, the day of the bombing.

     Furthermore, the commission said, the
     "Oklahoma Final Report," which was issued in
     July 1996 and published by the City of
     Oklahoma, reported two bombs. According to
     this report, the commission noted, "a bomb
     scare occurred at 10:29 a.m. and … 1:30 p.m.,"
     and that "both times the building was
     evacuated."

     In the immediate aftermath of the bombing, Dr.
     Randall Heather, a terrorism expert who was
     being interviewed by local TV station KFOR,
     "was quoted as saying that he was aware that
     the FBI received a [bombing] threat the previous
     week," the report noted.

     "It's a great stroke of luck that we actually have
     got diffused bombs," he told the station,
     because, the commission's report quoted
     Heather as saying, through bomb material "…
     we will be able to track down who committed
     this atrocity."

     Related stories:
     http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22874


     FBI ignores 'John Does'

     FBI refused 22 eyewitness testimonies

     McVeigh, Nichols 'did not act alone'

     Oklahoma City's lost information

     OKC blast linked to bin Laden

     OKC: 'We knew this was going to happen'

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22874

===============================================================
Oklahoma City Bombing Cover-Up
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okc_coverup.htm

The Aryan Republican Army, Elohim City, and the OKC Bombing
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/ara_okc.htm

"I'M NOT KEEPING MY MOUTH SHUT ANY LONGER ABOUT OKLAHOMA CITY!"
http://xld.com/public/jdt/jdt5-1.htm

"WE ARE APT TO SHUT OUR EYES AGAINST A PAINFUL TRUTH...
FOR MY PART, I AM WILLING TO KNOW THE WHOLE TRUTH;
TO KNOW THE WORST; AND TO PROVIDE FOR IT."
---- Patrick Henry

Without Justice, there is JUST_US!
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/apfncont.htm


Reply via email to