"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy
so
monstrous he cannot believe it
exists".
-- J. Edgar Hoover
===========================================
Here, in two postings, is overwhelming evidence that the crashes
were remotely controlled, that the "terrorists" were on what they
thought was a hijacking mission, but were themselves "stung" when
control of the planes was taken over by remote controllers.
Several articles by several people lend support to this aspect of
the frame-up/cover-up explanation of the September 11
crashbombings and the conquest of Afganistan.
The sabotage of New York-Cario flight EgyptAir flight
990,
on 11-31, 1999.
The
hijackers, never suspecting a suicide mission, were "stung," by
(CIA?,
Mossad?, renegade Mossad?, Mafia?) infiltrators posing as al Qu'eda
field
leaders on a mission under orders from bin Ladin. It was
infiltrators of al
Qu'eda who gave the long-waiting Qu'eda moles the right
activation passwords
and a set instructions to set a hijacking in
motion -- but later, when the
ordered hijacking was underway the
infiltrator handlers on the ground
(offshore?, in an AWAC?)took remote
control of the planes, turning them
into cruise missiles. (The
infiltrators were most likely Mossad and not CIA
because the the Israeli
government has told us that the U.S. has no
infiltrators in Central Asia and
is dependent upon Mossad for all of its
on-the-ground intelligence
there.
I am convinced that no one was knowingly on a WTC suicide mission.
The
4 planes were all taken over by remote control on 9-11-10 after
the
hijackings were begun.
The FBI has uncovered letters of the hijack
suspects indicating that they
were expecting to be arrested following the
hijacking, that the hijacking
was understood by the "set-up" hijackers to be
a relatively harmless
operation to draw attention to some cause.
But
the hijackers themselves were being misled as part of a
grand
counter-espionage sabotage frame-up sting. They were not aware
that they
were taking orders from Mossad agents and not Qu'eda (some
even suggest
that the bin Laden himself may be a double agent in his own
organization,
based on his prior CIA ties and the current economic ties of
his family with
both Presidents Bush.
Crashbombing by Remote
Control
And this was not to be the first time that a passenger jet was
crashed by
remote
sabotage --
EgyptAir 990 was crashed in a "test"
for the WTC operation, on Halloween
morning, 11/31/99.
On
November 31, two years ago, , EgyptAir flight 990, a giant Boeing 767
took
off from New York's JFK Airport bound for Cairo Egypt with 100
Americans and
87 Egyptians aboard.
The takeoff had been successful and routine, but at
one half hour into the
flight, at 1:48:30 ----at a moment when the
pilot left the controls for a
trip to the toilet and the co-pilot was
left in the cockpit alone -- an
English voice can be heard on the black box
recorder saying "control it"
(the co-pilot was Egyptian and had not been
speaking English with the pilot
that morning) -- when suddenly, one must
conclude, control of the plane
taken from him,i.e., the cockpit
controls were bing overridden. -- After
some seconds the co-pilot,
reacting to his losse of control to a phantom
controller, says,
"I'm
trusting you Jehovah" (or "I'm in your hands, Jehovah")
--"Tawakkalt
ala
Allah.")
The co-pilot then attempted to disengaged
the auto-pilot to restore control.
Control was not restored. The
co-pilot again reacted with this prayer
exclamation as the elevators dropped
putting the plane into a dive. After
sixteen seconds of this dive the
Captain returned to the cockpit asking
"What happening? Whats
happening?" Now captain and co-pilot were
presumably working to pull
out of the dive, but the controls were not
responding and now the throttles
turned up to full forward -- at which
point the co-pilot cut the fuel
lines. Then by phantom control the right
and left elevators each
moved all the way in the opposite directions and the
ailerons on both wings
both went fully up. The pilot cried "Get away in
the
engines! Shut the engines!" To which the co-pilot
replied,
"It's shut." The last words are those of the captain
frantically
instructing "Pull! Let's pull! Let's pull!" At
this point something shut
off the instrument recorders (or they were later
erased).
The American investigation said that the co-pilot committed
suicide, with
the Egypt AIr and the Egyptian government insisiting that that
is an
impossible interpretation of the audio message. The Egyptians --
who
understand the language -- insist that that is an impossible
interpretation
of last moments of conversation recorded or of the earlier
conversation at
takeoff, and that the co-pilot gave no evidence of emotional
instability.
------
Now in light of the above, an article
from the New York Times,
becomes more significant:
"One F.B.I.
official said the prayers found at the crash sites seemed
to exhort the foot
soldiers to be strong in prison - unlike the four-
page set of instructions
and prayers found in Mr. Atta's luggage,
which made it clear he believed he
was going to his eternal paradise."
===================
Dear Mr.
Eastman:
What you relate about the EgyptAir flight would appear to be
from a
transcript of the cockpit voice recorder. I would like to obtain a
copy for
myself; where did you get yours? Also, your assumption that this was
a test
fits the timeline very well. It would have done the planners no good
to have
a bunch of people from the Middle East spinning their wheels going
from
flight training school to flight training school because of the
security
problems they would raise while making sure the technology to do the
deed
worked properly.
What this means for the motive is huge. The
private actors involved would
need to have had their motive formulated prior
to November 1999, and the
Russian, British, Pakestani, Israeli and US
governments (among many) changed
administrations between then and now. Thus,
if planners were a part of the
US government, then they were quite possibly
already ensconced in the
government. However, it is entirely possible,
perhaps even more probable,
that the planners were private actors in 1999,
but became part of the
government in 2001. Yet, there is a third possibility:
The planners were
never a part of the government. And of course, there is the
potential that
some combination of all three is the reality. As I see it, the
main actors
are external to the government but operated with the consent of
or knowledge
by the highest level of government.
Another question:
Wouldn't each plane have needed its own external
controller? I also doubt
that the planes were controlled by an AWACS;
remember your robber analogy
about keeping it simple and not taking risks:
Too much can go wrong with an
airborne platform, including detection, so
ground controllers makes more
sense (Die Hard 2). All of this implies a
link to the manufacturer of
the remote equipment or theft of same provided
to the Air Force. I seriously
doubt any participation by another country in
this aspect of the
plan.
Yet another question: How many conspirators, not including those
who "died"
on the planes, who knew about the ultimate end of the plan are
involved?
First, there are the four controllers. Second, the person(s)
controlling the
controllers (although, even this person isn't needed). That's
it as far as I
can tell. All other involvement could easily be
compartamentalized, but this
additional number of actors isn't necessary for
the sufficient outcome of
the plan. It's entirely possible that the
controllers acted as the
financiers, recruiters, and messengers. It would
also have been possible to
place the numerous buy orders for the stocks in
question from one location
via computerized transactions. Only one recruiter
would be needed in
Chechnya, and that same person was most likely the handler
upon the recruits
arrival in the US for reasons of security. One, possibly
two, are the
financiers and stock traders. And someone had to procure the
technology,
know how to use it, and train the other controllers in its use.
Yes, it's
certainly possible that the group is larger than 4, but it need not
be, and
this creates a large problem on one hand and a small one on the
other.
Finding 4 needles in the many haystacks to be searched will be
difficult,
but those needles have very singular attributes. The easiest one
to find
will be the procurer of the technology; second, will be the
recruiter; and
third, will be the financier(s)/stock trader(s). Proving any
government(s)
complicity might prove difficult. For example, Bush might plead
that his
situation is like Kennedy's after the Bay Of Pigs: He didn't know
the
overall scope of this updated Operation Northwoods. The same will hold
true
for Cheany, Rumsfeld, Powell, Rice, and Wolfowitz. I can hear it now:
"It's
all the fault of that womanizing, immoral Clinton." (And it might be!)
I've
given a great deal of thought to this, and although the whole event was
very
complex on its surface, it would be entirely possible to carry it off
with
only 4 actual conspirators.
I know what you're thinking: I
haven't mentioned the bombs on the inside of
the WTC. I believe this part of
the plan has two potential scenarios: 1) it
was compartamentalized, the
explosives placed weeks if not months prior to
11 September, and
the
people who placed the explosives were eliminated. Or 2) it is
entirely
possible that our 4 controllers placed the explosives themselves
weeks if
not months prior to 11 September. Certainly, the controllers would
have had
to set off the explosives because only they knew the precise moment
of
impact. This places two of the controllers in the New York vicinity, one
in
the DC vicinity, and the other somewhere in Pennsylvania. All
controllers
would need to have direct visual contact with their planes as
they
approached their targets. This implies a high altitude vantage point
with
unobstructed sight lines. I know I ruled out airplanes (AWAKs) above,
and I
still do because of the high air traffic density over the target areas.
This
leads to the question: How powerful a transmitter would be needed to
send
the signals that controlled the planes and detonated the explosives?
Another
set of questions just occurred to me: Do we know when the
transponders of
the planes were turned off, especially the one over PA?
Speculation is rife
about the target for the PA plane, with a nuclear reactor
being the latest
hunch; what do we think given the available facts as we see
them? The answer
to this question is important because we can then begin to
figure out the
location of the fourth controller.
That's enough for
now. Remember Ockam's Razor before you argue for more than
four
planners.
Sincerely,
"Dan
Smith"
=========================
THE ENEMY IS INSIDE OUR
GATES
posted by: Colonel Donn de Grand Pré (US Army Retired)
(12
November 2001)
CONSIDER: ON 9-11, American Airlines flight 11, takes off
from Logan
(Boston) 7:59 am, Capt Oganowski, pilot, and Tom McGuinness,
co-pilot...
Destination - Los Angeles. As they climb to cruising altitude of
33,000
feet, they head west on an azimuth of 270 degrees for 70 miles. They
are
suddenly diverted from their intended flight route by an "unknown
outside
force" and flown in a northwest direction of 315 degrees for a
distance of
120 miles, which takes them into upstate New York. At this point,
they are
again sharply diverted and swung south in a 135 degree change of
direction.
They are now heading south at an azimuth of 180 degrees and in a
high-speed
shallow dive toward their intended target of the Twin Towers some
200 miles
away. In a matter of minutes, they plummet from a cruising altitude
of
33,000 feet to a height of 1,200 feet as they unerringly approach the
NYC
skyline and the World Trade Center.
Do the math!
Impact
time with the North Tower - 8:45... takeoff time from Logan -
7:59... flight
distance - 390 miles; time in the air - 46 minutes; average
speed - 508 MPH,
meaning that when considering the initial climb to
altitude speed of 350, the
final dive toward the towers (for a distance of
200 miles) has accelerated to
600 MPH.
Mission impossible? Not if you have become a guided
missile!
DO THE NUMBERS!
You can locate the flight manifests
(passenger lists) of all four fatal
flights of American and United Airlines
posted on CNN. Important that you
also read The Perplexing Puzzle of the
Published Passenger Lists ( see
"NaJam Saqib" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> of
11/08/01).
Consider that each posted original list comes up short of the
current and
official tally. For example, AA Flight 11 is supposed to have 92
people
aboard, including 11 crew members, plus 81 passengers. However, the
flight
manifest from American Airlines lists only 76 passengers (by name),
meaning
that "the phantom five" (supposedly Arab hijackers) are not on
the
manifest. How come?
The same is true of the other flight
manifests. Check the lists! Do the
numbers! There are no Arab or Middle East
names on these lists. Each list
is short a few names from the "official"
tally, meaning that somehow a
total of 19 Middle Eastern (Muslim) names are
missing from the passenger
lists. Of course, a separate listing is now
available, along with photo
IDs, of these 19 phantom passengers, together
with their aliases. How then
did they get on board the four fatal
flights?
Please help the FBI (or the CIA) locate these 19 missing men;
they are
wanted "dead or alive"; if you have a clue, let them know. Also,
please let
me know, as I too am perplexed... and
clueless.
------------------------
"Joe
Star"
=====================
: The Parallax View
> A
couple months ago I watched two skyscrapers crumble to the ground like
>
they were wet sand castles and some bully came along and kicked them
down.
>
> Now, this week an airplane fell apart-in the very same
city- as if it were
> made of wet crackers.
>
> And, as usual,
the public -like little kids gathered around the best of
> story tellers-
believes any ridiculous story the government controlled
media
> tells
them.
>
> This week's crashed plane's fuel only burned down a few
wooden homes. The
> plane in each tower somehow burned down two entire
steel sky-scrapers and
> many other steel sky-scrapers around them
collapsed also. ( Those two
planes
had much less fuel than the one that
hit the wooden homes.) Never mind many
people saying they heard explosions in
the other sky-scrapers and shut your
ears to witnesses saying they heard
explosions
in the third plane that crashed this week. (Remember, all 3 planes
crashed
in
New York too.)
The "boob-tube" is convincing you
the rudder ripped off first and the two
engines came off second. This
is not what witnesses standing out side
heard
and saw -like the pilot that
talked to Brian Gumble on TV at 11AM- that
morning had stated.
They
said they saw a plane with no engine and fire where the engine was
located,
then the other engine off in their view, next , the rudder came
off but they
thought it was a piece of the wing as the plane flipped over
and
nose
dived down.
The plane was 800 to 1200 ft.in the air and was doing
around 200
mph-barely
flying. This would not be enough stress to
fling a man off of it as he
clung
onto it with his finger
nails.
Oh..No? Have you seen the old World War One
dare-devils in "dog-fights"
with shot up planes -smoking in fire-they
fought for hours in the sky
>rolling over and flipping at high stress
conditions.
Have you seen the civilian pilot-co-pilots standing on
wings - during the
Roaring 20's-as the planes would flip and roll and
turn over vertically
and horizontally??The stunt men were still there when
they landed on the
ground.Also, the extreme stress of all of that crazy
flying never snapped
a plane in half.
Have you seen the
movies of military pilots-like "Top Gun?"
Have you ever watched PBS
or on satellite TV, the Discovery Channel or
the History Channel of
both World War I and World War II dog-fights in the
sky?
Have
you ever watched bombing raids and airborne rangers bailing out?
These planes
were shot up with dozens of bullets sometimes being hit by
big
guns
and explosions blowing off chunks of the plane and they
still flew them
back to base -many times!
In miles of vintage
war film footage you watch some crash from 20,000 feet
in complete
spinning nose-dives and not one wing,or rudder,or horizontal
stabilizer
rips off from the high altitude and high speed fall -and the
plane is
gapped with holes from being shot down.
But, these days with our
modern high technology some 50 to 75 years later,
our planes just fall
apart at low altitude and low speed as if they are
put together with Elmer's
Glue- and they weren't even shot up or blown up.
Remember a few
years ago when the entire top of a plane ripped off and the
passengers
made it back for a safe landing by wearing their oxygen
masks?(I can't
remember if that was a bomb or what that did that?) In
any,event it was at
high altitude and it made it back down safely. That
plane looked
like a
convertible with the roof rolled back, only the floor structure
held
the
> entire plane together-windows and all were
gone.
The Empire State building was hit by an Airforce bomber-B-29
or
something-and it only had a few chips of concrete fall from
it.
It is either simply corporations are making and maintaining
planes and
buildings so cheap now or else we have something much more
high tech and
clandestine happening here.
There was much
more fuel in the plane on the ground that only burned up a
> few
wooden homes than they planes that traveled for miles and then melted
>
the steel Twin Towers. This is very strange.
The plane that just
crashed acted as if it hit 3 giant steel wires
stretched above the houses.
Wire one ripped off the first engine, wire two
ripped
off the second
engine seconds later , then wire three ripped off the
rudder -vertical
stabilizer. The rudder section could have been ripped off
as after it
rolled over to crash.
Witnesses said one engine was off that area
of the wing was on fire. The
plane tilted sideways,then the other
engine was in view and it ripped off,
then the vertical
stabilizer-rudder came off.
Now, let us use our imagination here.
Suppose you are Black Operations
team sitting in a building aiming a new
directional Star Wars type weapon at
an
airplane. Like a sniper with
a rifle you only see one side of the plane.
You take out the engine , the
plane rolls sideways and you can see the other
wing, now you can take
out the second engine, and it is almost over head
so you zap the vertical
stabilizer which is in the horizontal position
overhead
now.
Power on, zap,zap and zap,then Boom. Is this what the
witnesses heard?
Gee? What a Conspiracy Theory?Well, back to
reality. Planes, I suppose, are
just so cheap-- like the sky scrapers
these days --we should never get back
into any of them ever again. I
boycott both for life!
But, just for the fun of it, about a
thousand of us on the Net need to go
to Internet search engines - like
Google-and do some link to link to link
digging into this matter. Just
for kicks type in: Star War Weapons, Sonic
Weapons, Laser
Weapons,Phaser-Orgon Weapons, Plasma Weapons, and other
research that the
Department Of Defense has been allocated to work
on -under
Col.John
Alexander and others of the D.O.D.(Doctors Of Death). They have
been
given trillions of dollars after W.W.II up to now for this
very
research.
But, on the other hand it makes us feel
better if we just our minds off
to it-right?We can say corporations just
build things cheap these days. It
is
true that cars and guns and
appliances and tools were made heavy but solid
and lasted through much
usage. We just don't build things like that
anymore because we don't build
anything anymore!
We don't like to get out of our comfort zones
with these issues do we?
Besides, if we question the CIA's TV dominance
we may wind up on their
"red-list" and get carpet-bombed
also-right?
While you are at it, read his books - one is under
Steve-"Future Warrior"
and the "Warriors Edge". In one of them he or
Steve Anderson states it is
to eliminate the
Constitutionalists,Libertarians,Conservatives and
Christian
Fundamentalists . Now, what are they doing in the Middle
-East? They are
eliminating the Muslim fundamentalists over seas.
Homeland Security,
Martial
Law and UN-NATO troops will do the
eliminating over here someday too. I
mean, after all they have already
written about it many times in many
places-they said they would. And,
they will!
This in my opinion is also a part of the Masonic "Ordo
Ab Chao"-they
secretly create the chaos ,blame it on somebody else or
something else,then
come up with their solution for a serene
society.
By the way, all the players in this -the President,the
Secretary Of
State,Attorney General,and the leader of Home Land Security -are
all
members of the good-ol-boy occult clubs like Masons, Skull-and
-Bones-,
Rosicrucians,Knights of Columbus, CFR, etc. It is in their
very nature to
operate this way-- in the shadows- to seize,and hold
economic fortunes
from the masses and then be appointed by the same blind
masses to political
power from generation to generation.
> But, on
the other hand, be logical and practical about this , we are not
the nation
we used to be. We used to make good solid products- now we have
lost our
production capabilities. We used to have free speech,the right
to
privacy, the right to private property and self defense with weapons
of
our own. But, they are getting ready to take all of that away from you
also
within the next 5 to 15 years.
Within two decades the
United States of America will be something on some
strange video or in
some strange underground history book you will have to
hide to read
or view in a closet or attic out of the way of government
spy
cameras.
It is the Parallax View !
Pointman
USA
============================
Was the CIA running a terrorist
flight school?
By Daniel Hopsicker
November 7, 2001
Your
"legend" is your cover story, in intelligence parlance; the lie that
holds
together long enough to let you skip the country . . .
The legends of
Rudi Dekkers as "flight school owner" and Mohamed Atta as
"fanatic Islamic
fundamentalist" have been fraying at the edges since the
collapse of the
World Trade Center.
Still, they may have lasted long enough to do the job
for which they were
intended. With a war on, no one seems to be losing sleep
over the fact that
the version of events currently being peddled about the
Sept.11 disaster
relies on what one law enforcement source wryly calls "the
Magic Dutch Boy"
theory.
In the Kennedy assassination, "the Magic
Bullet" theory allowed the FBI to
apply Lee Harvey Oswald's "lone nut gunman"
tag. The current "lone nut cadre
theory" of the FBI for the Sept 11 disaster,
goes this latest reasoning,
will only fly through use of a similarly-twisted
logic trail, one now being
called "the Magic Dutch Boy theory."
It
goes like this:
Both of the pilots who guided planes into the twin towers
of the World Trade
Center had trained at Rudi Dekkers' Huffman Aviation when
they first got to
America. Dekkers, a Dutch national, had only recently
purchased the flight
school located at the small out of the way Venice,
Florida, Airport.
The terrorist duo practicing touch and goes in the
humid September air on
Florida's Gulf coast were soon joined by a third
student terrorist pilot,
the one on UAL Flight 93. He signed up at the
Florida Flight Training Center
almost next door to Dekkers' Huffman Aviation,
making it a terrorist
trifecta out at the unsuspecting Venice
Airport.
Just like Dekkers' Huffman Aviation, this second flight school
had also just
changed owners. And the new owner of this flight school, too,
turns out to
be a Dutch national. His name is Arne Kruithof from Rotterdam in
the
Netherlands.
The magic Dutch boy theory says that the appearance
of these two foreign
nationals, both Dutch, purchasing flight schools at the
same time at the
same airport is merely a "magical" coincidence . .
.
Because if the appearance of a second Dutch national purchasing a
flight
school right as the terrorist cadre show up isn't just a strange
coincidence
belonging on Ripley's Believe it Or Not . . . then they're hiding
what looks
unmistakably like a covert intelligence operation down in
Venice.
It being Florida, that means the CIA is reputed to be active in
the state.
"Two Dutch boys buying adjacent flight schools which shortly
thereafter get
'overrun' by terrorists is one damn Dutch boy too many,"
stated our law
enforcement source. "It's untidy."
Was the CIA running
a covert, or black, operation out of the Venice Airport?
Might they have been
training pilots for bin Laden in an effort to penetrate
his organization that
went more-than-just-slightly-horrifically awry?
Will we someday be adding
"Magic Dutch Boy" to the "Magic Bullet" Wing of
the Secret History
Museum?
The local Venice Gondolier two days after the disaster ran a huge
black
headline reading: "Evil in our own backyard."
Underneath it they
had placed a picture of Rudi Dekkers facing a phalanx of
TV cameras out at
the Venice Airport. The irony of the juxtaposition did not
go
unnoticed.
"At first everyone just thought it was kind of amusing," an
aviation
employee at the airport said, "because it made Dekkers look like he
was the
'evil' in our backyard, which the newspaper probably didn't
mean."
Pause. "And then it hit me. Dekkers had purchased his aviation
school at
just about the time the terrorist pilots moved into town and began
their
lessons."
Is Rudi Dekkers just an innocent aviation executive
whose flight school
received the most unfortunate business publicity since
Ryder Trucks at the
time of the Oklahoma City bombing? Or is there a darker
reality lurking
behind his widely promoted public persona?
Reporters
swarmed the Venice airport in the days after the identity of the
terrorist
pilots and their relationship with the local flight schools became
known. An
analysis of their stories reveals that there were two different
versions of
events being given by flight school representatives; versions
that were in
disagreement even on basic chronology, such as which of their
schools the
terrorists attended first.
A flight instructor at Jones Aviation Flying
Service, Inc., which operates
from the Venice-adjacent Sarasota Bradenton
International Airport, told the
Associated Press that Atta and Al-Shehhi
arrived in "September or October"
and asked to be given flight
training.
Jones Instructor Ivan Chirivella said the two came to Jones
Aviation from
Huffman Aviation in Venice. Chirivella said he spent four hours
almost every
morning from September to October last year instructing Mohamed
Atta, 33,
and Marwan Yousef Alshehhi, 23.
But Rudi Dekkers at Huffman
Aviation, who has been getting all the national
face-time, had been telling a
different tale.They signed up at Huffman in
late July, he stated in
innumerable interviews, and stayed until December or
January. The two cadre
principals paid $20,000 apiece at the rate of $1000 a
week.
Dekkers
says the terrorist were at his school, located a half an hour south
of
Sarasota, down the Tammiami Trail, an old Indian path that wends through
the
mangrove swamps of Florida's Gulf Coast, at the same time the two
Jones'
Aviation instructors say the terrorist duo were flying four hours
every
morning with them.
Dekkers told his new buddy Larry King, and
anyone else with a microphone who
would listen, that when Atta & Co.
showed up at his school they were already
grumbling about a bad experience at
another school. This directly
contradicts the story the two Jones instructors
gave reporters.
Why can't the flight instructors at the two schools get
their stories
straight? Did Atta and his sidekick attend both flight schools
at once?
Here's another journalistic snapshot that gets a little blurry
when you look
at it a little closer:
In their inimitable British
tabloid style, London's Mirror TV filmed a
segment at the Venice Airport two
days after the disaster, which they
slugged: "IN THE COCKPIT WHERE A HIJACKER
LEARNED TO FLY!"
"THIS is the cockpit of the light aircraft in which
hijackers Mohamed Atta
and Marwan Al-Shehhi learned to fly," the Mirror's
American correspondent
told British viewers.
"Under the guidance of
instructor Mark Mickart I went through the same
pre-flight checks and
maneuvers on the white single-engine Cessna 172,
terrorists Atta and
Al-Shehhi had done on July 9."
"The same preflight
checklists!"
Wow. Kitsch history. What is of interest is the flight
instructor, Mark
Mikarts, busily showing the audience how the terrorists
checked off.
Mark Mikarts used to be somebody else.
His real name
is Mark Wierdak. The only relative of his we were able to
locate is a
half-sister. She works in the British consulate in Venezuela.
When we got in
touch with her to ask about her "flight instructor" brother's
new name all
she would say was, "We used to share the same father."
Pilot Mikarts also
flies out of the Sarasota-Bradenton Airport for a
Christian missionary group
called Agape Flights, which describe themselves
as an independent ministry
fighting disease, poverty and illiteracy by
serving missionaries in the
Western hemisphere and beyond. They have been
running a weekly flight down
and back to the Dominican Republic for more
than 20 years.
How many
guys using aliases fly American missionary flights servicing the
Caribbean
Basin? Mikarts is a perfect example of why things seem a little
out of skew
at the flight schools at the Venice Airport.
"Rudi's greedy, and when
you're greedy you can be used for something," a
Special Operations Commando
leader from the nearby McDill Air Force Base
told us.
"I've always had
some suspicions about the way he breezed into town out of
nowhere," said one
observer at the Venice Airport. "Just too many odd little
things. For
example, he has absolutely no aviation background as far as
anyone can tell.
And he evidently had no use for, nor knowledge of, FAA
rules and
regs."
These statements struck us as strange. "Breezed into town out of
nowhere"
and "no aviation background" doesn't square with the portrayal of
Dekkers in
newspaper clippings announcing his purchase of the flight school
two years
ago, which stressed his broad business aviation experience in
neighboring
Naples.
"Ambassador Airways owners Rudi Dekkers, 42,
Naples, president, and Wally
Hilliard, 67, also from Naples, were both said
to be experienced pilots."
Their Ambassador Airways was said to "own several
jet aircraft including
Lear jets." The new owners of Huffman Aviation have
global presence
The friends of Rudi Dekkers
Lack of proper
aviation background was also a comment heard about Dekkers in
an interview
this week with Richard Boehlke, a partner of Dekkers in a
recent airline
venture called Florida Air. Boehlke accuses Dekkers of not
having enough
experience to run a commuter airline and training facilities:
Portland
Native's Brush with Terror
"He (Dekkers) was an oxymoron the day I met
him," Boehlke told Portland
reporter Eric Mason. "I can't believe anyone
handed him millions of dollars
to run a business he had no experience
in."
Boehlke leveled another charge in his interview, stating Dekkers
had
suggested that his students hone their skills by acting as co-pilots
on
commuter routes in Florida and elsewhere. Boehlke said Dekkers urged him
to
allow students to ride-along as co-pilots on scheduled airline
flights,
which is illegal.
"They could have been terrorists on a
ride-along!" Boehlke told reporter
Eric Mason of Portland, Oregon, radio
station K-Pam. He said a "chill" runs
through him when he thinks about
it.
Said an FAA spokesman, about Dekkers' proposed scheme, "Having a
student
without enough hours or that type rating as a co-pilot is not
legal."
Boehlke said, "I was amazed knowing how close we'd been to that
training
environment. It would have given them legal access to cockpits and
other
secure areas in airports across the country."
Richard Boehlke's
claim to be "amazed" is like Capt. Renaud telling Bogie in
Casablanca that
he's shocked-shocked!-to find gambling going on, while
pocketing his winnings
at the same time.
For the 53-year-old Boehlke, the sun-drenched parties
aboard his personal
Grumman Albatross with friends in the San Juan Islands
are supposed to be
over. His huge flying boat sits for sale at the Tacoma
Narrows Airport in
Gig Harbor, along with other assets from his troubled
aviation company. He
is not however running noticeably short of cash,
observers note.
Boehlke was hot news because of his proximity to
terrorist flight school
owner Dekkers and his concurrent participation in
what the Securities &
Exchange Commission has called "the biggest fraud
by an investment manager i
n U.S. history."
"Ex-money manager charged
with fraud" was the headline in an Oct. 6 AP
story. A federal grand jury
indicted Jeffrey Grayson whose firm "collapsed"
losing hundreds of millions
of pension investments. Grayson was charged with
mail fraud, conspiracy,
money laundering, witness tampering and paying a
former union chief union
trust funds in a scheme that cost Grayson's clients
over $355 million in
failed and fraudulent investments.
Might the two stories have a
connection?
Might the same "international network" responsible for
stealing almost a
half billion dollars have been simultaneously training
terrorist air corps
in Florida?
Boehlke got $25 million to build a
condominium project that court documents
reveal cost only half that
amount.
Before Dekker's airline partner Richard Boehlke ever broke ground
on his
failed project, someone had already pocketed $13 million.
"I've
known Jeff Grayson (Capital Consultants' former CEO) for 12 years,"
Boehlke
said. "I have never known him to have any shady or, you know, some
have asked
me about . . . Mafia affiliations."
There. He said the "M"
word.
"Boehlke would do anything for money, he was so desperate," an
aviation
executive who had witnessed Boehlke's descent told us. "I'm
surprised he
hasn't skipped the country by now, what with all the trouble
he's gotten
himself into farting around with those Mafia boys down in
Portland."
Another grateful beneficiary of the money they were giving
away in Portland,
Oregon, from the retirement pension funds of the little
people-laborers and
secretarys-was a Miami Florida man whose complex web of
international
connections is legendary.
Alvin Malnik has been called
"Meyer Lansky's heir" as the head of organized
crime so often in print that
he should put it on his business cards.
But it is not Malnick's gangster
ties that make your jaw drop: it's his
connection with the Saudi Royal
Family.
Jewish "gangster" Alvin Malnick's son is married to the daughter
of a
leading prince of the Middle Eastern kingdom's founding
family.
"The Saudi prince not only blessed the marriage, but regularly
works with
the US organized crime associates," states one report on the
connection.
"The Saudi king would frequently send his private 747 to Florida
to pick up
Malnik and his associates, so they could conduct business on the
plane away
from prying eyes."
A Saudi King, A Mob Boss, and a
Terrorist Drug Kingpin
"Frankly, we can't differentiate between terrorism
and organized crime and
drug dealing," Assistant Attorney General Michael
Chertoff told the Senate
Banking Committee hearings about the terrorists'
money trail in the
aftermath of the Sept 11 disaster.
Terrorist groups
have been implicated in the $360 billion a year
international narcotics
trade, directed by organized crime, says Judge
Thierry Cretin of the European
Anti-Fraud Office.
As recently as six weeks ago, crime families were
being seen as particularly
important for terrorist groups involved in the
acquisition and transport of
arms, like in the case of a Jersey City man,
accused of attempting to
smuggle Stinger missiles out of the country to Osama
bin Laden, who is now
reportedly helping federal agents investigating the
Sept 11 terrorist
attacks.
If the deal he got caught doing was
typical, insiders say, it was oil and
heroin up front for guns and
training.
Oil and heroin upfront for arms and training. Now there's a
story we haven't
heard about yet in the roiling skies above the terrorist
flight schools on
the Gulf Coast of Florida.
And no one is saying
anything about the proximity to the terrorist's
training sites of nearby
Tampa, Florida, long the domain of reputed mob boss
and heroin kingpin Santo
Trafficante.
Daniel Hopsicker is the author of "Barry & 'the
boys;' The CIA, the Mob &
America's Secret
History."
========================
"Agent Smiley" has these comments
about Hopsicker's research:
> Let's go
through the check-in routine together.
> Pretend that it's September 11,
and you are a
> check-in
> agent at either a United Airlines counter
or an
> American
> Airlines counter. It is your job to ask
the
> standard
> questions. "Did you pack your own
luggage? Have
> you had
> it in your possession at all
times?" Then you ask
> for a
> photo ID. The name on the
ID must match the name on
> the
> ticket. The photo must match
the person presenting
> the
> card.
either
a] the entire
list is faked and there were few or no
passengers or
b] they did not board
the plane as passengers or
c] september 11 was a george lucas
production...just
kidding
>
>
So, the published names in no instance match
> the total
> listed
for the number of people on board. CNN
> really
> should offer
an explanation for this
discrepancy.
>
> In no case does an
Arab name appear on a list,
> let
> alone one of the alleged
hijackers.
>
> How did CNN fail to
count the names accurately?
> Did
> the airlines not provide
the full list of each
> flight's
> names? Perhaps
so.
in fact, the total missing names equal 35 people...16
more than
the supposed 19 hijackers
>
> This
raises the next question. How did the
> airlines
> know how
many people were on each of these flights?
> The
> airlines must
have had a list for each flight. What
> possible reason could they
have had for not
> releasing the
> full lists?
the american
airlines stock sins had something to do
with american airlines
executives...theorizing
Finally, why are there no Arabs
listed
> on any
> of these lists, let alone the specific
Arabs
> identified by
> the Attorney General and the head of the FBI
in an
> Associated Press story?
american airlines did NOT know in
advance and released
the accurate list and then were asked to spin
the
story...still theorizing
who manufactured that
plane?
boeing?
what a great commercial - the following week
boeing
sold about 400 million dollars worth of planes
to
china
suddenly, in october, we find out that american forces
are
"for the first time" using remote controlled
airplanes...camel
puckey!
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/valentine.htm
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/home_run.htm
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/psyopnews1.htm
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html
it
seems that the plane that was shot down was flight
93 - before it was shot
down it changed course and
began to head in direction other than new york
or
dc...prior it is said that it was on course for three
mile
island...perhaps a knowledgable pilot or
technician [or perhaps the flight
happened to have an
electronic engineer on board] was able to disable
the
remote control mechanism...
was it shot down to get rid of
witnesses to how it
was
done?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html
www.whatreallyhappened.com
www.rense.com
Yes
a bomb did go off on the 23rd floor of the North
Tower.
=================
There was a bomb on the 23rd floor of the North
Tower, but it was not set
off to bring down the structure. Here is how
that bomb prevented critical
FBI files stored there from exiting the
building.
The FBI offices on the 23rd floor --under the false shingle
front of New
York Blue Cross - Blue Shield -- of the North Tower were bombed
to
prevent agents from removing grand jury evidence in important
cases
stored there following the jet crashbombings. The evidence of
this was
given on the program 60 minutes, though one doubts CBS was
aware
what they were revealing.
A fellow in Main, Steve, has
given me, over the phone and into my tape
recorder, his recording of this
interview. Here is my careful transcription
of that
recording.
Steve's intro: "This is a segment of the 60 minutes
report, mid-October.
They're interviewing the Chief of Security for the World
Center Towers. The
60 Minutes reporter is doing the interview of George
Tabeek [phonetic
spelling of audio -- could be "Tabeak,"
etc.] They are talking about him
and a fire fighter named Andy
Desparino.
(Steve starts his vhs recording with his phone held to the
speaker):
Reporter:
...In another part of the tower George
Tabeek got a call that three Port
Authroity workers were trapped in command
center on the 22nd floor.
Tabeek (fuzzy sound-- as if dubbed in from an
edited-for broadcast phone
interview):
I said, "Stay calm, I'll be up
there." I went to the battalion chief; he
assigned a
lieutenant -- it's all I know is his first name, his first name
was
Andy ...
Reporter (clear sound-- not phone
interview):
Andy Desparino of Engine Company One
Tabeek:
And
worked our way all the way up to the twenty-second floor
Reporter
(fuzzy -- phone interview clip again):
Are people going
down?
Tabeek:
People were coming down. I was telling them,
"Please be calm" walk to the
left
Reporter (clear -- with jet impact
sound in background during first
sentence):
What George Tabeek didn't know
was that a second jet had just struck tower
seven (sic) And when they
reached the twenty-second floor of Tower One
Desperino and his men tunneled
through the debris and opened up a path for
those trapped inside.
Helen Reese, meanwhile, was at another Port
Authority Command Center talking
to those unable to get down from the upper
floors ...
(end of
excerpt)
Clearly a bomb went off 50 floors below where the first plane
hit
the North Tower, on the 23rd floor, collapsing the ceiling of the
22nd
floor. No records would be saved from the FBI
offices.
====================