Somebody claiming to be Daniel Fischer wrote:
On Monday 07 January 2013, 12:17:41, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:I think my vote would be to restructure the checks such that non-integral types are specially handled.The purpose of the test was to check whether two types have the same size, if I recall correctly?
Yes, and that is already partly specially handled. The "is it integral" check is sort of interesting, but we can know for sure that float, double, and long double are not and just skip to the sizeof() check.
-- Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted edition right joseph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
