Somebody signing messages as Stephen Paul Weber wrote:
Somebody claiming to be Daniel Fischer wrote:On Monday 07 January 2013, 12:17:41, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:I think my vote would be to restructure the checks such that non-integral types are specially handled.The purpose of the test was to check whether two types have the same size, if I recall correctly?Yes, and that is already partly specially handled. The "is it integral" check is sort of interesting
I'm not 100% sure that the attached patch is the right solution, but it seems to work both on my local system as well as with my cross-compiler, and is not so dramatic as to remove the integralness check entirely.
Feedback welcome. -- Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted edition right joseph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
