To the contrary, there have been questions raised about the book by
journalists who are not in any way a "Mitnick supporter." Check out way
back issues of CuD. Mitnick may well be a loser but that does not mean
everything written about him was true.
-Declan
t 10:57 3/4/2000 -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> > Markoff. Isn't that the guy who may have fabricated (artistic license)
> > portions of a less than adequately documented book for personal profit,
> > then collaborated on an even more ficticious movie?
>
>"May have fabricated", you don't have any proof, but you don't like what
>he wrote. As Cartman would say that's weak man.
>
>Since the accusations appear to come from Mitnick's supporters they
>have to be considered somewhat suspect.
>
>I know enough people who were involved in the previous investigations
>of Mitnick to corroborate the points I made, namely that Mitnick is a nasty
>piece of work and a pathetic loser rather than the harmless chap his
>defence attorney would have people believe.
