As there're already several applications in the SQLite:: namespace, it might be better to use (DBD::?)SQLite::Extension:: for the ones to be loaded via load_extension(), and (DBD::?)SQLite::Module:: (or whatever) for the ones that adds a customized callback etc.
Kenichi On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:52:37 +1000, Adam Kennedy <adamkennedybac...@gmail.com> wrote: >Now that we've got a number of integration points available for >feeding code into SQLite's internals, I'm wondering if we should >consider some form of blessed or recommended namespace for people to >write these extensions in. > >Are we just going to recommend SQLite:: or does anyone have alternatives? > >Adam K > >_______________________________________________ >DBD-SQLite mailing list >DBD-SQLite@lists.scsys.co.uk >http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite _______________________________________________ DBD-SQLite mailing list DBD-SQLite@lists.scsys.co.uk http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite
