I would vote for "SQLite::" ; the fact that there are already some modules in that namespace does not prevent people from creating new modules; on the contrary.
The DBD::SQLite:: namespace is specific for the driver, so I wouldn't recommend using that one. Finally, one could think of "SQLiteX::" (in the spirit of DBIx or MooseX), but I'm not sure it's a good idea, because the frontier between "applications using SQLite" and "extensions to SQLite" is not very clear; so best to put everything in the same bag. Cheers, Laurent D. >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Adam Kennedy [mailto:adamkennedybac...@gmail.com] >Envoyé : vendredi, 14. août 2009 13:53 >À : SQLite Mailing List >Objet : [DBD-SQLite] Ideas for people on a recommended >namespace forDBD::SQLite enhancement packages > >Now that we've got a number of integration points available for >feeding code into SQLite's internals, I'm wondering if we should >consider some form of blessed or recommended namespace for people to >write these extensions in. > >Are we just going to recommend SQLite:: or does anyone have >alternatives? > >Adam K > >_______________________________________________ >DBD-SQLite mailing list >DBD-SQLite@lists.scsys.co.uk >http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite > _______________________________________________ DBD-SQLite mailing list DBD-SQLite@lists.scsys.co.uk http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite
