We have run into an issue with array processing in 11g.  The developer
was using execute_array and his sql statement had 'LOG ERRORS' in it.
This did not error out until we switched to 11g.  The issue is that only
one is allowed, either 'LOG ERRORS' or 'SAVE EXCEPTIONS'.  Our DBA
logged and error report with Oracle and after several posts back and
forth this is what they concluded,

======================================================================
After investigation and discussion, development has closed the bug as
'Not a Bug' with the following reason:

"this is an expected behavior in 11g and the user needs to specify
either of 'SAVE EXCEPTIONS' clause or the 'DML error logging', but NOT
both together.
The batch error mode, in the context of this bug, is basically referring
to the SAVE EXCEPTIONS clause.
It seems the code is trying to use both dml error logging and batch
error handling for the same insert. In that case, this is not a bug.

For INSERT, the data errors are logged in an error logging table (when
the dml error logging feature is used) or returned in batch error
handles (when using batch mode).
Since the error messages are available to the user in either case, there
is no need to both log the error in the error logging table and return
the errors in batch error handles, 
and we require the user to specify one option or the other but not both
in 11G.

Both features exist in 10.x. For 11.x, users should change their
application to avoid the error.
======================================================================

So basically we need a way to turn off the 'SAVE EXCEPTIONS' for the
batch mode.  I found in dbdimp.c that the oci_mode is being set to 
OCI_BATCH_ERRORS in the ora_st_execute_array function.  I was planning 
on setting it to OCI_BATCH_MODE and running a test to see if this will
not error out.  I report back when I have run the test, but I was
wondering what would be the best way to give the user the ability to
override the oci_mode.  An attribute in the prepare method?  

Thanks,
Scott

Reply via email to