On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:38:38PM -0500, Brendan Byrd wrote: >> (Sent this a while ago on a work account, but I guess it didn't go through.) >> >> I am nearing completion of the following modules: >> >> DBD::FusionTables - Mostly complete except for tests/docs; however Google >> is wanting to fix a lot of their bugs in Fusion Tables before they consider >> it worth using. >> >> DBD::TreeData - Needs docs/tests, but it is so far working great. Just >> used it to create a few schemas via Catalyst/DBIC. >> >> DBD::SNMP - Not quite as complete as it's read-only, but I'm actively >> working on this right now, so that I can create DBIC schemas from it. >> >> How can I get a prefix set up within DBI? These are the unofficial >> prefixes I’ve been using within the modules: fust, tree, snmp. Can I take >> these? > > fust and snmp seem fine. tree makes me pause for thought as it seems a > bit too generic. On the other hand I can't think of anything better > (treed_ or trd_ were the best I could come up with) so go ahead. > > Thanks. > > Release early, release often! > > Remind me to patch DBI once they're released.
Pong. You can hold off on the fust one, but I still need snmp and tree. -- Brendan Byrd <p...@resonatorsoft.org> Brendan Byrd <bb...@cpan.org>
