May 23



GAZA:

EU condemns latest Hamas death sentences----EU, Norway condemn 3 death sentences against killers of senior Hamas terrorist Mazen Faqha.


The European Union (EU) Heads of Mission and the Head of Mission of Norway in Jerusalem and Ramallah on Monday condemned the 3 death sentences that were issued in Gaza against the suspected assassin and 2 suspected accomplices in the March death of senior Hamas terrorist Mazen Faqha.

"The Missions in Jerusalem and Ramallah recall their opposition under all circumstances to the use of capital punishment," said the statement, as quoted by the Palestinian Authority-based Ma???an news agency.

The statement added that the EU and Norway "consider that abolition of the death penalty contributes to the protection of human dignity and the progressive development of human rights."

It noted that the missions considered capital punishment "to be cruel and inhuman," and that "it fails to provide deterrence to criminal behavior, and represents an unacceptable denial of human dignity and integrity."

"The de facto authorities in Gaza must refrain from carrying out any executions of prisoners and comply with the moratorium on executions put in place by the Palestinian Authority, pending abolition of the death penalty in line with the global trend," the statement concluded.

The death sentences were handed down by a Gaza court on Sunday. The court ruled that Ashraf L., Faqha's alleged killer, was guilty of collaborating with "a hostile foreign entity" and premeditated murder.

The military court said he had been collaborating with an Israeli intelligence officer and "provided sensitive information about resistance and fighters" in return for money.

Faqha, a convicted terrorist released in the 2011 Shalit deal, was shot by unknown assailants in his Gaza home in March.

Hamas authorities in Gaza accused Israel of being behind his death immediately after it happened, and threatened to get Israel back for any action by Israeli security forces against Hamas senior officials.

Following Faqha's death, Hamas released a video in which it threatened to eliminate senior Israeli officials.

The group has arrested dozens of Gazans on charges of collaborating with Israel following the killing of Faqha.

Hamas regularly claims to have captured "Israeli spies", and many times it tries them and sentences them to death.

In theory all execution orders in the Palestinian Authority's (PA) territories must be approved by PA chairman Mahmoud Abbas, who is based in Ramallah and who imposed a moratorium on executions several years ago.

Hamas no longer recognizes Abbas's legitimacy, and has in the past emphatically declared that the death penalty in Gaza can be carried out without his consent.

(source: israelnationalnews.com)






UNITED KINGDOM:

Kent politician demands return of the death penalty following Manchester terror attack


The death penalty should be returned for terrorist crimes, according to a south east MEP.

Janice Atkinson, who lives in Chislehurst and stood for Ukip in Folkestone and Hythe before becoming an independent politican, made the comments in the wake of an attack in Manchester which killed 22 people, including children.

Dozens more were left injured following the attack by a suicide bomber at an Ariana Grande concert at Manchester Arena on Monday night.

Speaking this morning, Ms Atkinson said: "Much needs to be done to eradicate this evil. But there is 1 simple step which we can take now: we must bring back the death penalty.

"This is the 1st time I have called for this. For decades I have shifted in both directions: taking any life is wrong: it's right to execute certain types of killers, but what about miscarriages of justice?

"The risks of miscarriages of justice have now been largely overcome by the huge advances in DNA testing to a point of near-infallibility.

"Many will argue that I'm calling for revenge killings, motivated by hatred. Others will argue that I'm inhumane, that we live in a civilised society.

"Then there will be those who say that the death penalty is not a deterrent, that the warped perpetrators want in any case to die as martyrs.

"None of the above arguments stand up. Not now. We are at war and war crimes and terror cannot be given any quarter or allowed any glimpse of victory.

"These people are not deranged psychopaths, they are indoctrinated into an ideological belief that involves all out war against us.

"I'm not wringing my hands trying to find answers, I'm a politician, it's my job to come up with answers.

"Today, we should announce that the death penalty will be brought back for terrorist crimes."

(source: kentnews.co.uk)






LIBYA:

Mass Executions Alleged at Military Base----Investigate Crimes, Hold Perpetrators to Account


Forces aligned with the United Nations-backed Government of National Accord (GNA) attacked a military base and allegedly executed at least 30 captured soldiers, Human Rights Watch said today. A hospital official and an eyewitness told Human Rights Watch that soldiers from the 13th Battalion aligned with the GNA Defense Ministry attacked the base in Brak El-Shati, in southern Libya, on May 18, 2017, and executed troops from the 12th Battalion of the Libyan National Army (LNA).

The head of the GNA's Presidency Council ordered an investigation and the suspension of his defense minister and the commander of the battalion responsible for the attack. The summary execution of persons who have been captured or who have surrendered constitutes a war crime.

"The Government of National Accord should act on its promise to investigate allegations that its troops executed opposing forces who had already been rounded up," said Eric Goldstein, Middle East and North Africa deputy director at Human Rights Watch. "The authorities need to send a strong message that such crimes will not be tolerated which means that if the allegations are true, they should try those responsible."

The LNA does not recognize the authority of the GNA, and instead supports rival authorities based in the east.

A senior official in the main hospital in Brak El-Shati told Human Rights Watch by phone that the hospital had received 75 dead as of May 19, all adult men with the exception of 2 boys aged around 15, and that around 30 were military personnel. The official said that all the military dead had died from gunshot wounds, and that all had bullet wounds to their head. He also said that 5 corpses arrived at the hospital with bound arms, and another six had been disfigured in a way that suggested their heads had been run over by a vehicle. The official said the hospital received no one injured in the attack, nor did it receive any casualties from the 13th Battalion. News reports quoted an LNA spokesperson saying 141 were killed.

Human Rights Watch also spoke by phone on May 19 with a member of the LNA???s 12th Battalion who survived the attack, a member of the Libyan Red Crescent Society Brak El-Shati, and a spokesperson from the 13th Battalion. Human Rights Watch also reviewed extensive photo and video material related to the clashes.

Brak El-Shati military base is under the control of the LNA's 12th Battalion, commanded by General Khalifa Hiftar. Troops from the LNA's 10th Battalion were also present during the clashes. The LNA is allied with the Interim Government and House of Representatives based in the eastern cities of al-Bayda and Tobruk. The interim government is 1 of the 3 governments vying for legitimacy, international recognition, and control of territory in Libya. The LNA forces in the south have been engaged in an armed conflict with the 13th Battalion, an alliance of armed groups that includes the Third Force from Misrata, the Benghazi Defense Brigades, and other armed groups from the south. The 13th Battalion is under the command of Al-Mahdi Al-Barghathi, the GNA defense minister. The GNA, based in Tripoli, is the only Libyan government recognized by the UN Security Council.

According to the 12th Battalion soldier who witnessed the attack and asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation, elements of the 13th Battalion based in the nearby Tamenhint airbase, about 60 kilometers away, staged the surprise attack at around 9:30 a.m. The eyewitness said that the heavily-armed attackers, who included Chadian fighters, arrived in a large convoy of black armored vehicles.

The LNA soldier, who was at the main gate with around nine other LNA soldiers, said the attackers came out of their cars shooting and fought their way to the interior. The LNA soldiers returned fire but offered little resistance once the attackers had penetrated the base. The 13th Battalion withdrew 5 or 6 hours after arriving, taking prisoners.

Hiding under an overturned car during the attack, the LNA soldier said he saw nine comrades executed:

I saw the attackers catch my nine comrades who had been running with me from the main gate. They were disarmed, lined up in a row, and made to kneel on the ground. The attackers then sprayed them with bullets, and once they were lying on the ground dead, the attackers shot each and every one of them in the head. As they were shooting they were shouting, "You apostates, you enemies of God."

The soldier said that there did not seem to be much resistance in the base, but that he could hear intermittent shooting, which he believed to be "executions." He said 1 or 2 of his comrades survived by hiding among the dead, but that the attackers killed all the military personnel who did not hide or escape. He said they also killed civilian cooks, workers, and medical personnel. However, they did not harm detainees held by military police at the base. The soldier said that the attackers caused much destruction and looted vehicles, military equipment, and weapons.

According to the hospital official, the 75 bodies received included 2 migrant workers from Niger whose job was to unload food trucks at the base. He said the dead included 2 civilians unconnected to the base who were killed on the road. He said that relatives who accompanied one victim to the hospital told him the man had been shot in front of his family. The other, a truck driver, had been shot in the head, and both his arms broken. The hospital official said the retreating forces set ablaze the food warehouse and some trucks. He added that the nonmilitary victims were killed by gunfire but unlike the military victims did not have execution-style shots to the head.

Human Rights Watch reviewed at least 80 photographs and several videos that seemed to show the May 18 attack; they appeared to corroborate witness statements about the incident. The photographs showed mainly dead men, some in uniform, many with what appears to be a single gunshot wound to the front of the head. One video shows a group of 4 LNA detainees from the Brak El-Shati airbase in the back of a pickup truck, shackled, handcuffed, and blindfolded while fighters, seemingly from the 13th Battalion, give them water to drink as they talk about the events at the base.

Another video, shot from inside a car, shows a convoy driving on a desert road; the passengers say they are from the Benghazi Defense Brigades on their way to attack Brak El-Shati. The video then shows around 9 dead men face down as an unidentified person shoots at them and a voice calls them "mercenaries of Hiftar and dogs of Hiftar." Human Rights Watch cannot independently verify the videos or photos.

Mohamed Alghiwan, a spokesman for the 13th Battalion, told Human Rights Watch that forces from the battalion had attacked the Brak El-Shati base on May 18 in retaliation for many attacks on their Tamenhint base. Alghiwan denied that forces linked to the battalion had committed summary executions or any other laws-of-war violations during the attack.

Alghiwan added that the 13th Battalion suffered no injuries or deaths in the attack and took 14 or 15 prisoners. He said the battalion would release only civilian detainees.

All parties to a conflict are required to abide by the laws of war. Certain serious violations of the laws of war, when committed with criminal intent, such as executions of civilians or enemy fighters who had been captured or had surrendered, are war crimes. Anyone who commits, orders, or assists, or has command responsibility for war crimes, can be subject to prosecution by domestic courts or international courts. Commanders may be criminally liable for war crimes of their subordinates if they fail to hand over those responsible for prosecution.

"Senior commanders need to understand that they too can be implicated in war crimes unless they act resolutely to stop them and punish those responsible," Goldstein said.

(source: Human Rights Watch)






PHILIPPINES:

Filipino Catholics in 'show of force' against death penalty----Church leaders, activists up pressure on Senate to vote against capital punishment


Church leaders in the Philippines admit they need to "make more noise" because "people have not yet awakened" about issues that are contrary to the teachings of their faith.

Priests, nuns, and rights activists joined forces on May 21 in what was supposed to be a "show of force" to block the proposed revival of capital punishment in the Philippines.

A group of pilgrims that embarked on a 21-day cross-country march from the southern Philippines joined the protest march and Mass in Manila.

"This is part of the education of people," said Auxiliary Bishop Broderick Pabillo of Manila. He said people "still don't understand the issue and its relationship to our faith."

Church leaders need to "continue to evangelize [and] to stand to the challenges that the times present to us," the prelate said.

"Let us make a stand and tell the government that the death penalty is not the solution to criminality," said Bishop Pabillo.

Bishop Pablo Virgilio David of Kalookan exhorted those who attended the Mass to continue opposing "anti-life policies" proposed by the government.

Not against Duterte

Father Edwin Gariguez, executive secretary of the social action secretariat of the Philippine bishops' conference, clarified that the protest march was not aimed against President Duterte.

"This is not anti-Duterte or anything," said Father Gariguez. "This is a stand against death penalty," he said, adding that the intention of the march was to bring the message to senators.

The bill reviving capital punishment for drug-related crimes was passed by the Lower House in March, but Senate minority leader Franklin Drilon said the measure is already "dead" in the Senate.

Father Gariguez, however, said those opposed to the proposed measure "would like to get the support of as many senators as possible."

"We are happy that some senators are supporting us on this," he said. "It goes beyond adhering to the church's position because [opposition to death penalty] is universal," added the priest.

Symbolic gesture

Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle of Manila earlier urged Filipinos to join the movement to oppose the revival of capital punishment.

He said the "caravan for life" is an "opportunity to find ways of fighting crime ... without resorting to measures that also violate life like capital punishment."

Jesuit Father Jose Ramon Villarin, president of Ateneo de Manila University, said the march was "largely a symbolic gesture" that he hoped will create some waves.

The priest said a legislation that will revive the death penalty is "an additional burdensome law" that will not deter crime and will only be a "temporary solution."

Father Villarin said the caravan of at least 15 pilgrims shows that opposition to the revival of capital punishment is "not an elitist thing."

"The people from the basic sectors are here. These are people from all walks of life and they are speaking about issues that are close to their hearts," he said.

The priest noted that while it might take some time to block the passage of the proposed law, "I think it is important that we have made our voice heard this early."

The Philippine Senate is set to tackle the proposed death penalty law, which was earlier passed by the Lower House of Congress, on May 24.

(source: ucanews.com)






PAKISTAN:

Pak Senate panel demand death penalty for ex-TTP spokesperson


A Pakistan Senate panel has strongly criticized the government's 'special treatment' for former Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson Ehsanullah Ehsan, and demanded that he treated as a terrorist, and be given the death penalty as per the laws of the land.

The Senate's Standing Committee on Interior and Narcotics demanded that he not be treated like a guest or be fed in 5-star hotels.

They said that he was known to have played football with the severed heads of Pakistani soldiers.

The Ministry of Defence was further pulled up for presenting Ehsan on television channels, saying that the image of the country has taken a beating as a result.

Committee chairman Rehman Malik said, "Liaquat Ali alias Ehsanullah Ehsan is not an innocent person but a hardcore terrorist. He should be arrested in the FIR of Malala's case. He should be nominated in all cases for which he claimed responsibility."

"His glorification is against the law. He had no symptoms of being ashamed in his confessional statement," Malik added.

The Express Tribuen further quoted him, as saying that the entire nation wants to see him hanged. He said he deserved punishment similar to what Jadhav has been given.

(source: dnaindia.com)

*****************

Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly calls for Kulbhushan Jadhav's execution


The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly unanimously passed a resolution calling for the implementation of the death sentence handed down by a Pakistani military court to Indian national Kulbhushan Jadhav. The resolution moved by Mufti Said Janan of the Jamiat- i-Ulema-i-Islam Fazl (JUI-F) was signed by Pakistan Tehreek- e-Insaf, Jamaat Islami, Awami National Party, the Qaumi Watan Party, and Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz).

The resolution claimed that Jadhav was a Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) agent "involved in subversive activities in Pakistan" and had admitted his crimes before the interrogation team. He was arrested by Pakistani intelligence agencies on charges of "spying", the resolution said.

The Assembly demands that the provincial government should recommend to the federal government to implement the death sentence in accordance with the Pakistani laws, it said.

The resolution comes just days after the Hague-based International Court of Justice (ICJ) stayed Jadhav's execution and also endorsed the Indian request for consular access to him.

India moved the ICJ against the death penalty on 8 May.

Jadhav's case is the latest flash-point in the tensions between Pakistan and India. The 2 countries last faced off at the ICJ 18 years ago when Islamabad sought its intervention over the shooting down of its naval aircraft.

(sopurce: firstpost.com)



IRAN:

UN Experts Urge Halt to Iran's Executions of Juveniles


Iran has a history of executions for a variety of crimes, and age rarely impacts the choice of sentence. Currently, there are at least 90 people on death row in Iran under the age of 18, according to United Nations human rights experts. They urged authorities to abide with international law and immediately stop these executions. This call comes as 2 people, one 17 at the time of his sentencing and on 15, were given dates for their executions.

"These executions must be halted immediately and the death sentences quashed. We also call on Iran to commute without delay all such sentences imposed on children," said Asma Jahangir, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran; Agnes Callamard, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; and Benyam Dawit Mezmur, Chairperson of the Committee on the Rights of the Child.

Mahdi Bohlouli, who was 17 at the time of his sentencing in 2001, was due to be executed on April 19. His execution was halted a few hours earlier but the current status of his execution is unclear. Meanwhile, Peyman Barandah, who was sentenced in 2012 at the age of 15, is scheduled to be executed on May 10.

"These 2 cases bring the total of juvenile offenders scheduled for execution that we have become aware of in Iran since January to 6. They include the cases of 2 young persons whose executions was carried out," the experts noted.

In 2013, the Iran penal code was amended to allow the possibility of juveniles sentenced to death to be allowed retrials. Later, assurances were given in 2016 by Iran to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child that this amendment would apply systematically for all juveniles who are currently on death row.

In addition, the experts pointed out that by ratifying both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Iran has committed itself to protecting and respecting children's right to life as well as to outlaw the death penalty for all those under the age of 18.

"These promises have not been fulfilled: Some of the young men executed recently were not even aware of the possibility of retrials, and the requests made by Mahdi Bohlouli and Peyman Barandah for retrial were simply rejected by the Supreme Court," according to the experts. In other cases, the juveniles were simply sentenced to the death penalty again after being retried.

(source: themediaexpress.com)






NIGERIA:

Death penalty for kidnappers in Benue as Ortom signs 2 bills into law


It is no longer business as usual for kidnappers in Benue State, as the anti-kidnapping bill signed into law by Governor Samuel Ortom has slammed death penalty on any kidnapper found liable.

Governor Ortom at the stakeholders meeting held on Monday at government house, Makurdi shows stringent penalties for kidnappers, hostage taking, cult members, their accomplices and other similar offences.

Traditional rulers, prominent political office holders both at national amid state levels, politicians and others in their categories were in attendance where governor Ortom presented his midterm score card.

The 2 executive bills signed into law are; Adoption, hostage taking, kidnapping secret cult and similar offences as well as open grazing prohibition and ranches establishment law, 2017.

The former law gives more stringent penalty for offenders and accords more power to law enforcements agents than the latter.

Going by the highlights of the 1st law, it stipulates that anyone whose house is used for unlawful detention and kidnapping if found guilty is liable to death sentence.

Detonation of explosive instrument within the state will now attract 5 years while anyone found to be a member of secret cult is liable to 10 years without option of fine.

The law also stated that whoever is found guilty of hostage taking and found guilty will earn 10 years jail term while any act of terrorism attracts liable punishment of 14 yrs.

Also whoever permits his premises to be used for hostage taking such property will be forfeited to government, also any threat to person on kidnapping is liable to 7 years jail terms.

The new law also stipulates that any public office holders who sponsor kidnapping and found liable will be removed from office and risk 3 years in jail, it also added that anyone in possession of illegal firearms in state will and upon conviction be jailed for 3 years while whoever aids cultism is also liable to 3 years jail term.

The anti grazing law provides that anyone who engages in open grazing in Benue State and on conviction will now be liable for 5 years imprisonment.

The new law provides for monetary compensation in case of any damage to a property and imprisonment of 2 years of the livestock owner or manager in case of injury to any person in the state.

"Where such contravention causes the death of any person within the state, the owner or manager of such livestock shall be guilty of an offense of culpable homicide punishable under the penal code law".

It also provides that anyone who engages in cattle rustling shall be liable on conviction for imprisonment of a term not less than 3 years or payment of 100,000 per animal or both.

(source: Nigerian Tribune)






MALAYSIA:

Amnesty calls for halt to execution of man on death row


Amnesty International Malaysia (AIM) has called on the Government to stop the imminent execution of a man who was sentenced to death for shooting at policemen during an armed robbery in 2002.

AIM executive director Shanimi Darshni Kaliemuthu said in a statement that the family of Yong Kar Mun, 48, received a letter on Monday asking them to visit him for the last time at 9am on Tuesday at the Sungai Buloh Prison.

Shamini said that based on existing practice, the execution is expected to take place this week.

Yong was sentenced to death by the High Court in March 2009. He failed in his appeals at the Court of Appeal and Federal Court in October 2011 and August 2012.

He was sentenced to death in 2009 under Section 3 of the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971, which carries the mandatory death penalty.

Yong was charged with bank robbery and opening fire at Julayili Hassan, Yusry Awang Takung and Abdul Ghani Ahmad and Mohd Fadzil Ibrahim with the intention of causing death or injury.

He was accused of committing the crime with Teng Mun Hoong, 40, who was shot dead during their attempt to flee after the incident at Bandar Sri Damansara on June 3, 2002.

"The imposition of the mandatory death penalty is prohibited under international law, which also states that, in countries where it has not yet been abolished, the imposition of the death penalty must be restricted to 'the most serious crimes', meaning intentional killing," said Shamini.

She added information isn't made publicly available on individual death penalty cases and families are often informed merely days before that their loved ones will be executed.

(source: thestar.com.my)

********************

Amnesty wants halt to execution of death row inmate----It adds that according to international law, the mandatory death penalty can only be handed out for 'the most serious crimes' such as intentional killings.


Amnesty International Malaysia wants the government to immediately halt the execution of a man on death row, expected to take place any time within the next 72 hours.

It said Yong Kar Mun, 48, had "days, if not hours, left to live", adding that based on existing practice, the execution was expected to take place this week.

"Yong's family received a letter by hand from the Sungai Buloh Prison at 2pm today, asking the family to visit him for the last time tomorrow at 9am. "The family does not know when Yong will be executed," Amnesty International Malaysia executive director Shamini Darshni Kaliemuthu said in a statement today.

Yong has been on death row since March 2009. He was sentenced to death under Section 3 of the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971, which carries the mandatory death penalty, read together with Article 37 of the Penal Code, after being found guilty of discharging a firearm during an armed robbery.

Although no casualties occurred as a result of the robbery, another man involved in the act of robbery was shot dead during the subsequent police chase.

Yong failed in his appeals to the Court of Appeal on Oct 6, 2011 and Federal Court on Aug 2, 2012.

Noting that the imposition of the mandatory death penalty is prohibited under international law, Amnesty International added that even in countries where it had not been abolished, the same law restricts the death penalty to "the most serious crimes", meaning intentional killing.

It said information is hardly made publicly available on individual death penalty cases, and that families are often informed merely days before their loved ones are executed.

"The lack of transparency around executions in Malaysia is a violation of international law and standards.

"Families must have sufficient time to prepare for the last visit and take any further recourse available at the national or international level. To date, they still do not know when the execution is due to be carried out," Shamini said.

"Amnesty International Malaysia does not downplay the seriousness of the crimes committed, but we urge the authorities to consider introducing more effective crime prevention measures that respect human rights instead of continuously using one that has no merit."

The NGO also called on the government to immediately impose a moratorium on executions with a view to full abolition.

(source: freemalaysiatoday.com)






TURKEY:

Turkey opens trial of suspected military coup plotters----Trial of 221 main suspects of July 15 coup bid begins amid heavy security and calls for death penalty.


More than 220 suspects, including over two dozen former Turkish generals, have gone on trial accused of being among the ringleaders of the attempted coup last year aimed at ousting President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Protesters outside Turkey's largest courtroom in the Sincan district of Ankara called on Monday for the death penalty for the accused and flung rope nooses at the defendants as they were paraded into court handcuffed and held by the security forces.

Erdogan: Turkey coup bid 'an act of treason'

"We want the death penalty, we don't want them to be fed and housed here. We want these traitors to be buried without any flag," said protester Cengiz Ozturk.

Turkey abolished the death penalty as part of its drive to join the European Union but Erdogan has on occasion indicated it could be reimposed to deal with the coup plotters.

There was heavy security in place on Monday, with a drone flying overhead and armoured security vehicles on site as well as snipers on the roof.

Hearings at the trial, one of the largest of several coup-related trials taking place across Turkey, are expected to last until June 16.

Turkey blames the attempted July 15 putsch on the US-based Muslim cleric Fethullah Gulen, a claim he strongly denies, and has launched a relentless purge under a state of emergency against those deemed to have backed the plot.

Gulen is among 12 of the 221 suspects in the current trial who remain at large, with the remainder appearing in court for the 1st time inside a prison complex in Sincan.

26 generals are among those charged, including former air force chief Akin Ozturk and Mehmet Disli, the brother of senior ruling party lawmaker Saban Disli.

Also on trial is colonel Ali Yazici, Erdogan's former military aide, and Lieutenant Colonel Levent Turkkan, who was the aide of Chief of Staff General Hulusi Akar.

The most prominent figure among the suspects, Ozturk was dressed crisply in a black sweater and held a blue file as he was led into the court.

His appearance contrasted with the last known image of him which showed him bearing injuries including a bandaged ear after his capture 2 days after the coup bid.

Almost 40 of those on trial are accused of being part of the "Peace At Home Council", the committee established by the suspected coup plotters to replace the government if the putsch had succeeded.

The charges against them include "violating the constitution", "using coercion and violence in an attempt to overthrow" the parliament and the Turkish government, "martyring 250 citizens" and "attempting to kill 2,735 citizens", Hurriyet daily reported on Sunday.

The attempted putsch left 248 people dead, according to the Turkish presidency, not including 24 coup-plotters killed on the night.

(source: aljazeera.com)
_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to