also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi <c...@debian.org> [2014-08-23 09:52 -0700]: > - it seems to requires/encourage big local teams (so no new > countries/continents)
How so? Each BidTeam can consist of one person, or 10. It is the job of the advisory board to constitute the DebConfN team out of that. So if the BidTeam is big, that'll be fine. If the bid team is very small but they won the bid, then more global people or remote volunteers will need to help. > - IMHO will demotivate regular organisers/volunteers How so? > - not so flexible (in last debconfs we did a lot of > experimentation: DC12 without local DD, DC13 with old style > (sleeping bag style), DC14 without DebCamp, DC15 without a fix > city at bid decision. How does my proposal inhibit flexibility? If a DebConfN bid specifies e.g. sleeping bags and no DebCamp, and the bid is chosen, then that's what DCN will be like… > I think one of the root of the problem is the bid process: bid teams are > almost alone to prepare the bid (which it is also good on helping screening > bids/teams) Indeed. My proposal addresses this. > The bid should be simplified: the basic should be only venue, > accommodation, food (and a short feasibility check of the other > topics). Agreed. This will require less time, so we can make the bid decision well before February, allowing more time and more resources to be used on the winning bid. Really interested in hearing your answers to the above questions about how you think my proposal falls short. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf14: Portland, OR, USA: http://debconf14.debconf.org DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team